Does Customer Concentration Matter in Exploratory Innovation? The Moderating Effect of Board Interlocks and CEO Research Background

Both managers and researchers closely examine the factors that motivate firms to explore new domains and acquire new knowledge in pursuit of greater innovation. Considering the role of demand-side factors in innovation, in this study, we investigate how customer concentration influences exploratory innovation based on Chinese listed firms from 2009 to 2019. As the characteristics of the top management team (TMT) may affect the influential mechanism, we further investigated the moderating effects of board interlocks and the CEO’s research background. Our results demonstrate that with the increase in customer concentration, the exploratory innovation level shows an inverted U-shaped trend. The board interlocks strengthen the positive effects of customer concentration on exploratory innovation, while a CEO’s research background mitigates the negative effects. Our findings offer key insights and serve as a benchmark for companies that aim to achieve innovation in their approach to managing customer relationships and organizing their top management teams.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010203
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Customer Concentration Matter in Exploratory Innovation? The Moderating Effect of Board Interlocks and CEO Research Background

Yushu Zhang, Fushang Cui, Caiting Dong, Fangcheng Tang
Sustainability
Innovation and Knowledge Management
article

Does Customer Concentration Matter in Exploratory Innovation? The Moderating Effect of Board Interlocks and CEO Research Background

Yushu Zhang, Fushang Cui, Caiting Dong, Fangcheng Tang
article en

Abstract

Both managers and researchers closely examine the factors that motivate firms to explore new domains and acquire new knowledge in pursuit of greater innovation. Considering the role of demand-side factors in innovation, in this study, we investigate how customer concentration influences exploratory innovation based on Chinese listed firms from 2009 to 2019. As the characteristics of the top management team (TMT) may affect the influential mechanism, we further investigated the moderating effects of board interlocks and the CEO’s research background. Our results demonstrate that with the increase in customer concentration, the exploratory innovation level shows an inverted U-shaped trend. The board interlocks strengthen the positive effects of customer concentration on exploratory innovation, while a CEO’s research background mitigates the negative effects. Our findings offer key insights and serve as a benchmark for companies that aim to achieve innovation in their approach to managing customer relationships and organizing their top management teams.

SustainabilityVol. 18(1)
Chongqing Technology and Business University (CN), Beijing University of Chemical Technology (CN), Beihang University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Centre Scientifique et Technique du Bâtiment
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Does Customer Concentration Matter in Exploratory Innovation? The Moderating Effect of Board Interlocks and CEO Research Background — Yushu Zhang, Fushang Cui, et al. · Sustainability (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS