Hierarchical Organization and Stability of Geographical Spaces: Ecological–Geographical Analysis

This article describes a strategy for the quantitative analysis of mono- and polysystem organization of multilevel geospaces with the construction of a series of empirical models of intercomponent and intercomplex connections. As a methodological basis, a provision on structural levels of natural–territorial organization is proposed based on a conceptual cybernetic model of a natural complex as a hierarchical control system. Using the model, a system of conjugation of different-level characteristics of natural components with a taxonomic rank of geographic spaces (from a geographic sector and natural zone to a landscape facies and biogeocenosis) is constructed. Based on the spatiotemporal relationships of intercomponent and intercomplex connections, a hypothetical cycle of the trajectory of changes in the states of geospaces in their spontaneous development and under anthropogenic disturbances is described. The assessment of the dynamics of geospaces is carried out through operations with their ecological niches in the zones of their contact and intersection, i.e., in trigger zones. The stability of different-order geospaces to external disturbances is proposed to be expressed by measures of significance of their representation of the entire variety of input environmental factors. These measures serve as generalized criteria of homeostatic reserves of natural complexes. They are calculated on the basis of matrices and digraphs of their inclusion relations for a particular set of system-forming factors using the Shannon information function. Using the example of the southern taiga of the Volga basin, an example of calculating one of these measures in relation to a change in the average July temperature is given.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geography and Natural Resources
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s1875372825700258
Primary Topic
Scientific Research and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hierarchical Organization and Stability of Geographical Spaces: Ecological–Geographical Analysis

E. G. Kolomyts
Geography and Natural Resources
Scientific Research and Studies
article

Hierarchical Organization and Stability of Geographical Spaces: Ecological–Geographical Analysis

E. G. Kolomyts
article en

Abstract

This article describes a strategy for the quantitative analysis of mono- and polysystem organization of multilevel geospaces with the construction of a series of empirical models of intercomponent and intercomplex connections. As a methodological basis, a provision on structural levels of natural–territorial organization is proposed based on a conceptual cybernetic model of a natural complex as a hierarchical control system. Using the model, a system of conjugation of different-level characteristics of natural components with a taxonomic rank of geographic spaces (from a geographic sector and natural zone to a landscape facies and biogeocenosis) is constructed. Based on the spatiotemporal relationships of intercomponent and intercomplex connections, a hypothetical cycle of the trajectory of changes in the states of geospaces in their spontaneous development and under anthropogenic disturbances is described. The assessment of the dynamics of geospaces is carried out through operations with their ecological niches in the zones of their contact and intersection, i.e., in trigger zones. The stability of different-order geospaces to external disturbances is proposed to be expressed by measures of significance of their representation of the entire variety of input environmental factors. These measures serve as generalized criteria of homeostatic reserves of natural complexes. They are calculated on the basis of matrices and digraphs of their inclusion relations for a particular set of system-forming factors using the Shannon information function. Using the example of the southern taiga of the Volga basin, an example of calculating one of these measures in relation to a change in the average July temperature is given.

Geography and Natural ResourcesVol. 46(3)
Institute of Basic Biological Problems (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Scientific Research and Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.