Evaluating the efficacy of flipped classroom teaching– learning method compared to traditional classroom method in teaching homoeopathic materia medica to third BHMS students: A quasi-experimental self-control study

Objectives: Conventionally, homoeopathic materia medica is taught to undergraduates (UG) through the lecture or traditional classroom (TC) method. The TC method faces limitations such as limited time and attention spans, one-sided lectures, passive learning and limited scope of interaction. We therefore aimed to use the flipped classroom (FC) strategy and observe its benefits while teaching a content-heavy subject like materia medica. Material and Methods: This was a quasi-experimental self-controlled study conducted for III BHMS students at a UG college in Maharashtra. Four lectures were conducted; two using the TC method, followed by two using the FC method. Pre- and post-test assessments were conducted after the 2 nd and 4 th lectures. After all 4 lectures were completed, a feedback form comprising the quantitative and descriptive aspects of both methods was provided to the students for recording their overall experience. Results: The difference between the pre- and post-test scores was statistically significant in both groups. The students’ feedback forms showed a preference for FC. Amongst the students, 60% found FC excellent for learning, more engaging, interesting and enjoyable and encouraged deeper thinking, understanding and connections. Further, 53% could connect to the shared information in an FC and 54% could resolve their doubts. After FC, 68% students were definitely confident about applying the learning in the clinical setting and examination; 76% were definitely satisfied with the FC. Conclusion: TC likely enables better recall-based outcomes, as seen through better performance in multiple-choice tests, whereas FC had better outcomes in long-answer tests, possibly because it focused on differentiation between remedies, which requires higher cognition such as analysis, evaluation and qualitative appreciation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Integrated Standardized Homoeopathy
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/jish_48_2025
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the efficacy of flipped classroom teaching– learning method compared to traditional classroom method in teaching homoeopathic materia medica to third BHMS students: A quasi-experimental self-control study

Bipin Sohanraj Jain, Bhavik Ramesh Parekh, Akshata Damodar Nayak, Deepak Kulkarni et al.
Journal of Integrated Standardized Homoeopathy
Innovative Teaching Methods
article

Evaluating the efficacy of flipped classroom teaching– learning method compared to traditional classroom method in teaching homoeopathic materia medica to third BHMS students: A quasi-experimental self-control study

Bipin Sohanraj Jain, Bhavik Ramesh Parekh, Akshata Damodar Nayak, Deepak Kulkarni, Shubhangi Sukumar Magdum, Ashwin Shrikant Kulkarni
article en

Abstract

Objectives: Conventionally, homoeopathic materia medica is taught to undergraduates (UG) through the lecture or traditional classroom (TC) method. The TC method faces limitations such as limited time and attention spans, one-sided lectures, passive learning and limited scope of interaction. We therefore aimed to use the flipped classroom (FC) strategy and observe its benefits while teaching a content-heavy subject like materia medica. Material and Methods: This was a quasi-experimental self-controlled study conducted for III BHMS students at a UG college in Maharashtra. Four lectures were conducted; two using the TC method, followed by two using the FC method. Pre- and post-test assessments were conducted after the 2 nd and 4 th lectures. After all 4 lectures were completed, a feedback form comprising the quantitative and descriptive aspects of both methods was provided to the students for recording their overall experience. Results: The difference between the pre- and post-test scores was statistically significant in both groups. The students’ feedback forms showed a preference for FC. Amongst the students, 60% found FC excellent for learning, more engaging, interesting and enjoyable and encouraged deeper thinking, understanding and connections. Further, 53% could connect to the shared information in an FC and 54% could resolve their doubts. After FC, 68% students were definitely confident about applying the learning in the clinical setting and examination; 76% were definitely satisfied with the FC. Conclusion: TC likely enables better recall-based outcomes, as seen through better performance in multiple-choice tests, whereas FC had better outcomes in long-answer tests, possibly because it focused on differentiation between remedies, which requires higher cognition such as analysis, evaluation and qualitative appreciation.

Journal of Integrated Standardized HomoeopathyVol. 8
Father Muller Homoeopathic Medical College (IN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Innovative Teaching Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.