The Accuracy in Rupture Risk Prediction of Intracranial Aneurysms by Artificial Intelligence Algorithms Using Imaging Data From CTA and DSA: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Ruptured intracranial aneurysms (IAs) are the leading cause of aSAH. There are limitations in combining traditional imaging methods (CTA and DSA) and clinical scores (PHASES) to predict IAs rupture risk, whereas artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms show potential. This meta-analysis evaluated AI algorithm performance for predicting IAs rupture risk based on CTA and DSA. As of February 2025, we searched Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Embase, extracting TP, FP, FN, and TN from included studies. The combined sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were synthesised with a bivariate random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed. PROSPERO: CRD420251008866. Twenty studies (13,232 patients, 14,344 IAs) reported pooled sensitivity 0.84 (95% CI: 0.80-0.87), specificity 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78-0.86), and AUC 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87-0.92) with substantial heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses showed DOR in the DSA versus CTA groups (DSA 23.55, CTA 22.21) with persistent heterogeneity. The clinical-morphological-radiomics group had DOR 18.76 without heterogeneity. By publication year, 2021 group had a lower DOR (12.99) versus 2022 (23.03) versus 2023 (26.98), with low heterogeneity. AI algorithms predicting IAs rupture risk based on CTA and DSA demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy and have potential to advance the field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IET Systems Biology
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1049/syb2.70050
Primary Topic
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Accuracy in Rupture Risk Prediction of Intracranial Aneurysms by Artificial Intelligence Algorithms Using Imaging Data From CTA and DSA: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Ruibo Liu, Ligang Chen, G B Liang, Guangxin Chu et al.
IET Systems Biology
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
article

The Accuracy in Rupture Risk Prediction of Intracranial Aneurysms by Artificial Intelligence Algorithms Using Imaging Data From CTA and DSA: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Ruibo Liu, Ligang Chen, G B Liang, Guangxin Chu, He Ma, Liang Ma, Hai Jin, Ruixuan Zhang
article en

Abstract

Ruptured intracranial aneurysms (IAs) are the leading cause of aSAH. There are limitations in combining traditional imaging methods (CTA and DSA) and clinical scores (PHASES) to predict IAs rupture risk, whereas artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms show potential. This meta-analysis evaluated AI algorithm performance for predicting IAs rupture risk based on CTA and DSA. As of February 2025, we searched Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Embase, extracting TP, FP, FN, and TN from included studies. The combined sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were synthesised with a bivariate random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed. PROSPERO: CRD420251008866. Twenty studies (13,232 patients, 14,344 IAs) reported pooled sensitivity 0.84 (95% CI: 0.80-0.87), specificity 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78-0.86), and AUC 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87-0.92) with substantial heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses showed DOR in the DSA versus CTA groups (DSA 23.55, CTA 22.21) with persistent heterogeneity. The clinical-morphological-radiomics group had DOR 18.76 without heterogeneity. By publication year, 2021 group had a lower DOR (12.99) versus 2022 (23.03) versus 2023 (26.98), with low heterogeneity. AI algorithms predicting IAs rupture risk based on CTA and DSA demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy and have potential to advance the field.

IET Systems BiologyVol. 20(1)
General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region (CN), Northeastern University (CN)
Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.