Co‐produced agricultural research can provide value for communities while building trust and public support for science

Abstract Agricultural systems are vulnerable to extreme weather, market volatility, and changing socio‐cultural contexts. Despite efforts to create transformational solutions in agriculture to ensure economic, social, and environmental sustainability, there is often a disconnect between research findings and real‐world experience. Co‐production is a collaborative process that engages farmers, ranchers, and other community members as equals in research design and implementation, incorporates diverse knowledges, and includes community members as research decision‐makers. While co‐production requires more time, trust, and institutional support, it offers greater research impact and increased public support for science as a problem‐solving tool. We share three case studies from our own research, and an introduction to the literature featuring best practices, to illustrate pathways for integrating co‐production in research programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural & Environmental Letters
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.70053
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co‐produced agricultural research can provide value for communities while building trust and public support for science

Jules Reynolds, Hailey Wilmer, Alison J. Duff
Agricultural & Environmental Letters
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
article

Co‐produced agricultural research can provide value for communities while building trust and public support for science

Jules Reynolds, Hailey Wilmer, Alison J. Duff
article en

Abstract

Abstract Agricultural systems are vulnerable to extreme weather, market volatility, and changing socio‐cultural contexts. Despite efforts to create transformational solutions in agriculture to ensure economic, social, and environmental sustainability, there is often a disconnect between research findings and real‐world experience. Co‐production is a collaborative process that engages farmers, ranchers, and other community members as equals in research design and implementation, incorporates diverse knowledges, and includes community members as research decision‐makers. While co‐production requires more time, trust, and institutional support, it offers greater research impact and increased public support for science as a problem‐solving tool. We share three case studies from our own research, and an introduction to the literature featuring best practices, to illustrate pathways for integrating co‐production in research programs.

Agricultural & Environmental LettersVol. 11(1)
Agricultural Research Service (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Co‐produced agricultural research can provide value for communities while building trust and public support for science — Jules Reynolds, Hailey Wilmer, et al. · Agricultural & Environmental Letters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS