Utilization of Custom Stemmed Tibial Tray for Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Case Series

Research Type: Level 4 – Case series Introduction/Purpose: Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is quickly becoming a viable option for end-stage ankle arthritis management, owing to rapid improvement of implant quality and surgical technique. However, in the rare cases of failure, viable modalities of revision are necessary. Thus, this study aimed to examine the safety and efficacy of custom stemmed tibial tray in a series of patients who experienced failure of their primary TAA. Methods: 7 unique patients (8 ankles) who underwent revision TAA with a single surgeon at a tertiary care center from May 2023-March 2024 following primary TAA failure were retrospectively identified. All patients had a custom short-stem 3D printed tibial tray inserted. Data on age at surgery, time to most recent follow up, time to weightbearing, utilization of postoperative physical therapy (PT), pain and radiographic changes at most recent follow up, and requirement of reoperation/revision surgery were collected. Results: Patients were 61 years old on average (range 36-80 years old) with an average follow up of 255.38 days (range 98-468). Patients were cleared to weightbear at an average of 69.14 days after surgery (range 36-80 days), and all patients initiated and were adherent to physical therapy. Pain at final follow up was 4.17 out of 10 on average (range 3-6). Medial distal tibial angle (MDTA) and sagittal distal tibial angle (SDTA) were comparable between immediately postoperative and most recent radiographs. Implant survivorship was 100%, with no patients requiring reoperation or revision. Conclusion: As demonstrated by the findings from this case series, custom short stemmed tibial tray can be a viable option in the armamentarium of a foot and ankle surgeon when weighing implant choices for a revision TAA. While further and higher evidence research is necessary to provide additional support, it can be utilized without concerns of serious complications in the short term.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011425s00511
Primary Topic
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utilization of Custom Stemmed Tibial Tray for Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Case Series

Selene G. Parekh, David I. Pedowitz, Kush S. Mody, Joydeep Baidya et al.
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Foot and Ankle Surgery
article

Utilization of Custom Stemmed Tibial Tray for Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Case Series

Selene G. Parekh, David I. Pedowitz, Kush S. Mody, Joydeep Baidya, Nana Amponsah, Joseph Daniel, Grant Thomas
article en

Abstract

Research Type: Level 4 – Case series Introduction/Purpose: Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is quickly becoming a viable option for end-stage ankle arthritis management, owing to rapid improvement of implant quality and surgical technique. However, in the rare cases of failure, viable modalities of revision are necessary. Thus, this study aimed to examine the safety and efficacy of custom stemmed tibial tray in a series of patients who experienced failure of their primary TAA. Methods: 7 unique patients (8 ankles) who underwent revision TAA with a single surgeon at a tertiary care center from May 2023-March 2024 following primary TAA failure were retrospectively identified. All patients had a custom short-stem 3D printed tibial tray inserted. Data on age at surgery, time to most recent follow up, time to weightbearing, utilization of postoperative physical therapy (PT), pain and radiographic changes at most recent follow up, and requirement of reoperation/revision surgery were collected. Results: Patients were 61 years old on average (range 36-80 years old) with an average follow up of 255.38 days (range 98-468). Patients were cleared to weightbear at an average of 69.14 days after surgery (range 36-80 days), and all patients initiated and were adherent to physical therapy. Pain at final follow up was 4.17 out of 10 on average (range 3-6). Medial distal tibial angle (MDTA) and sagittal distal tibial angle (SDTA) were comparable between immediately postoperative and most recent radiographs. Implant survivorship was 100%, with no patients requiring reoperation or revision. Conclusion: As demonstrated by the findings from this case series, custom short stemmed tibial tray can be a viable option in the armamentarium of a foot and ankle surgeon when weighing implant choices for a revision TAA. While further and higher evidence research is necessary to provide additional support, it can be utilized without concerns of serious complications in the short term.

Foot & Ankle OrthopaedicsVol. 10(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Foot and Ankle Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.