Preoperative Halo Traction Versus Direct Posterior Fusion in Severe Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Comparative Study

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> This study aimed to evaluate the effect of preoperative halo-gravity traction (HGT) on surgical outcomes in adolescents with severe idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), comparing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) performed with versus without traction in terms of curve correction, complication rates, and overall surgical efficacy. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 46 adolescents (mean age 14.6 ± 1.9 years) with severe AIS (Cobb > 65°) treated at a single tertiary center between 2011 and 2024. Sixteen patients underwent primary PSF, and 30 received preoperative HGT followed by PSF. Radiographic parameters-including Cobb angle and Risser grade-were analyzed pre- and postoperatively. Statistical tests (<i>t</i>-test, Mann-Whitney U, and multivariable linear regression) assessed differences in correction and predictors of outcome, with <i>p</i> < 0.05 considered significant. <b>Results:</b> Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups (mean preoperative Cobb: 83.6° ± 11.2° vs. 83.1° ± 15.6°, <i>p</i> = 0.91). The traction cohort achieved significantly smaller postoperative Cobb angles (30.9° ± 7.8° vs. 42.7° ± 18.9°, <i>p</i> = 0.027), greater absolute correction (52.7° ± 7.4° vs. 40.4° ± 10.5°, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and higher percentage correction (63.3% ± 6.7% vs. 50.0% ± 14.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Regression analysis confirmed HGT as an independent predictor of improved correction (+14.6%, 95% CI +6.9-22.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.00047). No neurological or major complications occurred, and most correction was achieved within the first three weeks of traction. <b>Conclusions:</b> Preoperative halo-gravity traction significantly enhances deformity correction and surgical safety in severe AIS without added morbidity. Most benefit occurs within 21 days, supporting shorter, standardized traction protocols. HGT remains a valuable adjunct for optimizing outcomes in rigid scoliosis prior to posterior spinal fusion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15010142
Primary Topic
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preoperative Halo Traction Versus Direct Posterior Fusion in Severe Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Comparative Study

Alexandru Herdea, Alexandru Ulici, Mihai Bogdan Popescu, Cristiana A. Popescu et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
article

Preoperative Halo Traction Versus Direct Posterior Fusion in Severe Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Comparative Study

Alexandru Herdea, Alexandru Ulici, Mihai Bogdan Popescu, Cristiana A. Popescu, Nicolae Ionescu, Harun Marie, Mihai Codrut Dragomirescu
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> This study aimed to evaluate the effect of preoperative halo-gravity traction (HGT) on surgical outcomes in adolescents with severe idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), comparing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) performed with versus without traction in terms of curve correction, complication rates, and overall surgical efficacy. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 46 adolescents (mean age 14.6 ± 1.9 years) with severe AIS (Cobb > 65°) treated at a single tertiary center between 2011 and 2024. Sixteen patients underwent primary PSF, and 30 received preoperative HGT followed by PSF. Radiographic parameters-including Cobb angle and Risser grade-were analyzed pre- and postoperatively. Statistical tests (<i>t</i>-test, Mann-Whitney U, and multivariable linear regression) assessed differences in correction and predictors of outcome, with <i>p</i> < 0.05 considered significant. <b>Results:</b> Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups (mean preoperative Cobb: 83.6° ± 11.2° vs. 83.1° ± 15.6°, <i>p</i> = 0.91). The traction cohort achieved significantly smaller postoperative Cobb angles (30.9° ± 7.8° vs. 42.7° ± 18.9°, <i>p</i> = 0.027), greater absolute correction (52.7° ± 7.4° vs. 40.4° ± 10.5°, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and higher percentage correction (63.3% ± 6.7% vs. 50.0% ± 14.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Regression analysis confirmed HGT as an independent predictor of improved correction (+14.6%, 95% CI +6.9-22.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.00047). No neurological or major complications occurred, and most correction was achieved within the first three weeks of traction. <b>Conclusions:</b> Preoperative halo-gravity traction significantly enhances deformity correction and surgical safety in severe AIS without added morbidity. Most benefit occurs within 21 days, supporting shorter, standardized traction protocols. HGT remains a valuable adjunct for optimizing outcomes in rigid scoliosis prior to posterior spinal fusion.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(1)
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest (RO), Spitalului Clinic de Urgență pentru Copii Maria Sklodowska Curie (RO)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.