Influence of Midfoot Deformities on Hindfoot Alignment Measurement – Comparison of Second Ray, Midfoot or Mortise Alignment on Weight-Bearing CT

Research Type: Level 3 - Retrospective cohort study, Case-control study, Meta-analysis of Level 3 studies Introduction/Purpose: Hindfoot malalignment is linked to various foot and ankle pathologies. Accurate assessment is paramount for surgical planning. Traditional plane radiographic methods are limited by malrotation and superimposition, while weight-bearing CT (WBCT) provides precise spatial information. One established measurement method uses the second metatarsal as reference axis. This reference may be unreliable in the presence of foot deformities, potentially affecting hindfoot alignment measurements. The aim of this study was to assess how referencing of WBCT by second-ray, midfoot or ankle mortise, influences hindfoot alignment measurements in the presence of midfoot deformities. Methods: WBCT and standard foot radiographs of 136 patients were examined. Hindfoot alignment (isolated 3D hindfoot angle, I3HA) was measured comparing three reference axes: the established second metatarsal axis, the midfoot and the ankle mortise. Sgarlato angle (SA) was measured on standard radiographs as an indicator of midfoot deformity. I3HA measurements were compared between feet with normal or pathological SA values. Results: I3HA varied significantly across different reference systems (second metatarsal: 10.0°, midfoot: 12.7°, ankle mortise: 15.2°; p< 0.001). When comparing feet with normal versus pathological SA (>20°), I3HA showed significant differences when using the second metatarsal as reference (p < 0.001). Referencing to midfoot or ankle mortise remained stable, with no significant difference. Conclusion: Midfoot pathologies significantly influence hindfoot measurements when using the second metatarsal as reference axis, potentially leading to inaccurate results. In contrast, midfoot and ankle mortise referencing resulted in more stable hindfoot alignment measurements. Hindfoot alignment values have a direct influence on surgical technique and execution, making accurate measurements crucial for appropriate surgical correction.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011425s00299
Primary Topic
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of Midfoot Deformities on Hindfoot Alignment Measurement – Comparison of Second Ray, Midfoot or Mortise Alignment on Weight-Bearing CT

Arnd Viehöfer, Silvan Beeler, Stephan Wirth, Reto Sutter et al.
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Foot and Ankle Surgery
article

Influence of Midfoot Deformities on Hindfoot Alignment Measurement – Comparison of Second Ray, Midfoot or Mortise Alignment on Weight-Bearing CT

Arnd Viehöfer, Silvan Beeler, Stephan Wirth, Reto Sutter, Alberto Pedrazzini, Pascal Furrer, Flamur Zendeli
article en

Abstract

Research Type: Level 3 - Retrospective cohort study, Case-control study, Meta-analysis of Level 3 studies Introduction/Purpose: Hindfoot malalignment is linked to various foot and ankle pathologies. Accurate assessment is paramount for surgical planning. Traditional plane radiographic methods are limited by malrotation and superimposition, while weight-bearing CT (WBCT) provides precise spatial information. One established measurement method uses the second metatarsal as reference axis. This reference may be unreliable in the presence of foot deformities, potentially affecting hindfoot alignment measurements. The aim of this study was to assess how referencing of WBCT by second-ray, midfoot or ankle mortise, influences hindfoot alignment measurements in the presence of midfoot deformities. Methods: WBCT and standard foot radiographs of 136 patients were examined. Hindfoot alignment (isolated 3D hindfoot angle, I3HA) was measured comparing three reference axes: the established second metatarsal axis, the midfoot and the ankle mortise. Sgarlato angle (SA) was measured on standard radiographs as an indicator of midfoot deformity. I3HA measurements were compared between feet with normal or pathological SA values. Results: I3HA varied significantly across different reference systems (second metatarsal: 10.0°, midfoot: 12.7°, ankle mortise: 15.2°; p< 0.001). When comparing feet with normal versus pathological SA (>20°), I3HA showed significant differences when using the second metatarsal as reference (p < 0.001). Referencing to midfoot or ankle mortise remained stable, with no significant difference. Conclusion: Midfoot pathologies significantly influence hindfoot measurements when using the second metatarsal as reference axis, potentially leading to inaccurate results. In contrast, midfoot and ankle mortise referencing resulted in more stable hindfoot alignment measurements. Hindfoot alignment values have a direct influence on surgical technique and execution, making accurate measurements crucial for appropriate surgical correction.

Foot & Ankle OrthopaedicsVol. 10(4)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Foot and Ankle Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.