Seven Strategies Implemented in Response to the 16th Ebola Virus Disease Outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo: Lessons Learned over a Three-Month Period

The 2025 Ebola outbreak that ravaged the Bulape Health District (HD) in Kasai, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), was tackled using the incident management system (IMS) model. The Bulape HD is located in the Mweka territory, which has experienced two Ebola epidemics: one in 2007 and another in 2008. The IMS comprises seven strategies recommended for an effective response to an Ebola outbreak: (i) thorough investigation, (ii) strengthening infection prevention and control measures in the community, (iii) ensuring that medical care is provided by experienced professionals, (iv) strengthening risk communication and community engagement (RCCE), (v) ring vaccination, (vi) operational research, and (vii) anchoring interventions in the existing health system. We share our experience implementing these seven strategies and compare them with those utilized during three previous Ebola outbreaks. This paper describes our achievements, the resulting benefits, and the factors that facilitated the implementation of the aforementioned strategies. A literature review and interviews were conducted. The atlas.ti 22 software was used for data analysis. Implementing these seven strategies contributed to an effective response, largely due to the experience and expertise of those involved but also thanks to the support of technical and financial partners (TFPs) and the engagement of the local community. Challenges such as geographical accessibility, the fragile health system, the community's strong attachment to traditional practices, and negative reactions to healthcare-which was widely discredited, with many of those involved expressing a lack of faith in its effectiveness-were major obstacles. To overcome these challenges, an integrated approach was utilized, combining a rapid comprehensive response with deep and respectful community engagement. The support and alignment of TFPs were invaluable during this process. The RCCE pillar proved key to successful IMS implementation. Our experiences will be useful during the next Ebola outbreak in the DRC; additionally, they may also help to inform the response to similar outbreaks in other countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Viruses
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/v18010028
Primary Topic
Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seven Strategies Implemented in Response to the 16th Ebola Virus Disease Outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo: Lessons Learned over a Three-Month Period

Richard Kitenge, Mory Keïta, Pierre Akilimali, Serge Kapanga et al.
Viruses
Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
article

Seven Strategies Implemented in Response to the 16th Ebola Virus Disease Outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo: Lessons Learned over a Three-Month Period

Richard Kitenge, Mory Keïta, Pierre Akilimali, Serge Kapanga, Alice Montoyo, Christian Ngandu, Grégory Moullec, Dieudonné Kazadi Mwamba, Mathias Mossoko, Gaston Tshapenda, Emilia Sana, Francis K. Kabasubabo, John Otokoye Otshudiema, Danny Kalala, Henriette Bulambo, Béatrice Serra, Bienvenu Kabasele, Deogratias Kakule, Christina Zarowsky, Erick Kamangu, Olea Balayulu, Waly Diouf, Jeanpie Muya, Nella Ntumba, Célestin Manianga, David K. Kayembe, Olive Leonard, Karl B. Angendu, Marie-Claire Mikobi, Jack Katya, Cris Kasita, John Kombe
article en

Abstract

The 2025 Ebola outbreak that ravaged the Bulape Health District (HD) in Kasai, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), was tackled using the incident management system (IMS) model. The Bulape HD is located in the Mweka territory, which has experienced two Ebola epidemics: one in 2007 and another in 2008. The IMS comprises seven strategies recommended for an effective response to an Ebola outbreak: (i) thorough investigation, (ii) strengthening infection prevention and control measures in the community, (iii) ensuring that medical care is provided by experienced professionals, (iv) strengthening risk communication and community engagement (RCCE), (v) ring vaccination, (vi) operational research, and (vii) anchoring interventions in the existing health system. We share our experience implementing these seven strategies and compare them with those utilized during three previous Ebola outbreaks. This paper describes our achievements, the resulting benefits, and the factors that facilitated the implementation of the aforementioned strategies. A literature review and interviews were conducted. The atlas.ti 22 software was used for data analysis. Implementing these seven strategies contributed to an effective response, largely due to the experience and expertise of those involved but also thanks to the support of technical and financial partners (TFPs) and the engagement of the local community. Challenges such as geographical accessibility, the fragile health system, the community's strong attachment to traditional practices, and negative reactions to healthcare-which was widely discredited, with many of those involved expressing a lack of faith in its effectiveness-were major obstacles. To overcome these challenges, an integrated approach was utilized, combining a rapid comprehensive response with deep and respectful community engagement. The support and alignment of TFPs were invaluable during this process. The RCCE pillar proved key to successful IMS implementation. Our experiences will be useful during the next Ebola outbreak in the DRC; additionally, they may also help to inform the response to similar outbreaks in other countries.

VirusesVol. 18(1)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US), Inserm (FR), University of Kinshasa (CD), Alliance for International Medical Action (SN), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (UG), World Health Organization (CH), National Institute of Biomedical Research (CD), Institut d’Epidémiologie Neurologique et de Neurologie Tropicale (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Université de Limoges (FR), Université de Montréal (CA), Cheikh Anta Diop University (SN)
UNICEF, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.