The Diagnostic Performance of a Four-Gene Digital Droplet PCR Panel for Urine Liquid Biopsy in Urothelial Bladder Cancer

<b>Background</b>: Urothelial bladder carcinoma (UBC) is a disease that lacks robust non-invasive laboratory biomarkers. Recently, urine liquid biopsy has emerged as a promising tool for diagnosis and surveillance of patients with these tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic potential of a urinary tumor DNA detection panel, which included eight common point mutations in <i>TERT</i>, <i>GPR126</i>, <i>FGFR3</i>, and <i>PIK3CA</i> genes, in UBC. <b>Methods</b>: The study included patients with histologically confirmed UBC (<i>n</i> = 88) and patients with cystitis, bladder leiomyomas, or other non-malignant conditions (control group; <i>n</i> = 72). DNA was extracted from whole urine specimens. ddPCR analysis was performed using the Bio-Rad QX200 AutoDG ddPCR system. <b>Results</b>: Urinary tumor DNA detection panel demonstrated a sensitivity of 78.4% and a specificity of 100% (AUC-ROC = 0.892). Detection rates for the analyzed mutations were the following: 54.5%, 37.5%, 28.4%, and 38.6% for <i>TERT</i>, <i>GPR126</i>, <i>FGFR3</i>, and <i>PIK3CA</i>, respectively. Pairwise comparisons of mutant allele fractions (MAFs) for samples simultaneously positive for ≥2 mutations revealed an absence of significant differences (<i>p</i> > 0.05), except for the pair of <i>FGFR3</i> vs. <i>PIK3CA</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.03). MAFs were not associated with any clinical and demographic features (<i>p</i> > 0.05), with the only exception being the tumor size: patients with tumors larger than 2.16 cm<sup>3</sup> had higher MAFs than the rest (23.4 [1.8; 46.3] vs. 1.6 [0; 24.6] %, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.02). <b>Conclusions</b>: Upon further validation, the presented tumor DNA detection panel for ddPCR might become a useful tool for diagnostic purposes in UBC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16010069
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Diagnostic Performance of a Four-Gene Digital Droplet PCR Panel for Urine Liquid Biopsy in Urothelial Bladder Cancer

A. S. Tivtikyan, Рахматуллин Тагир Ирекович, Vladislav Kokarev, Mark S. Jain et al.
Diagnostics
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
article

The Diagnostic Performance of a Four-Gene Digital Droplet PCR Panel for Urine Liquid Biopsy in Urothelial Bladder Cancer

A. S. Tivtikyan, Рахматуллин Тагир Ирекович, Vladislav Kokarev, Mark S. Jain, Dmitry Kislyakov, M. E. Zvereva, Larisa Mikhailovna Samokhodskaya, Armais Kamalov, Lolita Vorobeva, David Kamalov
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Urothelial bladder carcinoma (UBC) is a disease that lacks robust non-invasive laboratory biomarkers. Recently, urine liquid biopsy has emerged as a promising tool for diagnosis and surveillance of patients with these tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic potential of a urinary tumor DNA detection panel, which included eight common point mutations in <i>TERT</i>, <i>GPR126</i>, <i>FGFR3</i>, and <i>PIK3CA</i> genes, in UBC. <b>Methods</b>: The study included patients with histologically confirmed UBC (<i>n</i> = 88) and patients with cystitis, bladder leiomyomas, or other non-malignant conditions (control group; <i>n</i> = 72). DNA was extracted from whole urine specimens. ddPCR analysis was performed using the Bio-Rad QX200 AutoDG ddPCR system. <b>Results</b>: Urinary tumor DNA detection panel demonstrated a sensitivity of 78.4% and a specificity of 100% (AUC-ROC = 0.892). Detection rates for the analyzed mutations were the following: 54.5%, 37.5%, 28.4%, and 38.6% for <i>TERT</i>, <i>GPR126</i>, <i>FGFR3</i>, and <i>PIK3CA</i>, respectively. Pairwise comparisons of mutant allele fractions (MAFs) for samples simultaneously positive for ≥2 mutations revealed an absence of significant differences (<i>p</i> > 0.05), except for the pair of <i>FGFR3</i> vs. <i>PIK3CA</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.03). MAFs were not associated with any clinical and demographic features (<i>p</i> > 0.05), with the only exception being the tumor size: patients with tumors larger than 2.16 cm<sup>3</sup> had higher MAFs than the rest (23.4 [1.8; 46.3] vs. 1.6 [0; 24.6] %, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.02). <b>Conclusions</b>: Upon further validation, the presented tumor DNA detection panel for ddPCR might become a useful tool for diagnostic purposes in UBC.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(1)
Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU), Moscow State University (TJ)
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.