The Canine Cognitive Dysfunction Syndrome Working Group guidelines for diagnosis and monitoring of canine cognitive dysfunction syndrome

Canine cognitive dysfunction syndrome (CCDS) is diagnosed with increasing frequency, yet standardized diagnostic guidelines are lacking. The CCDS Working Group, an international group combining experts in the field and primary care veterinarians, proposes a definition of the syndrome and practical diagnostic criteria designed to aid clinicians and researchers alike. Canine cognitive dysfunction syndrome is defined as a chronic, progressive, age-associated neurodegenerative syndrome, characterized by cognitive and behavioral changes that affect daily life to varying degrees. These changes affect the behavioral domains of disorientation, social interaction, sleep disruption, house soiling, learning and memory, activity changes, and anxiety (DISHAA). We propose 3 severity stages. In mild CCDS, signs are subtle and of low frequency or severity, with preserved function. With progression, behavioral changes become more apparent and impactful, requiring management adjustments. In severe CCDS, debilitating deficits are overt, significantly impairing basic functions and necessitating comprehensive support. Two diagnostic levels are proposed. Level 1 is based on consistent history of progressive DISHAA signs, identification of alternate causes through physical, orthopedic, and neurologic examination and laboratory work; either normal neurologic examination or evidence of symmetrical, diffuse forebrain dysfunction; and persistence of signs following management of relevant comorbidities. Level 2 includes a brain MRI showing cortical atrophy with CSF cell counts within normal limits. Definitive postmortem histopathological confirmation rests on cortical atrophy, amyloid deposition, myelin loss, neuroinflammation, and amyloid angiopathy. Future priorities include the development of blood biomarkers and cognitive testing batteries for routine clinical settings, both of which will refine diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.25.10.0668
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Canine Cognitive Dysfunction Syndrome Working Group guidelines for diagnosis and monitoring of canine cognitive dysfunction syndrome

Margaret E. Gruen, Julie A. Moreno, Stephanie McGrath, Caitlin S. Latimer et al.
2 citations
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
3.63
article

The Canine Cognitive Dysfunction Syndrome Working Group guidelines for diagnosis and monitoring of canine cognitive dysfunction syndrome

Margaret E. Gruen, Julie A. Moreno, Stephanie McGrath, Caitlin S. Latimer, Natasha J. Olby, Holger A. Volk, Phillipa J. Johnson, Brennen McKenzie, Enikő Kubinyi, Mônica Tarantino, Joseph A. Araujo, Gary Landsberg
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Canine cognitive dysfunction syndrome (CCDS) is diagnosed with increasing frequency, yet standardized diagnostic guidelines are lacking. The CCDS Working Group, an international group combining experts in the field and primary care veterinarians, proposes a definition of the syndrome and practical diagnostic criteria designed to aid clinicians and researchers alike. Canine cognitive dysfunction syndrome is defined as a chronic, progressive, age-associated neurodegenerative syndrome, characterized by cognitive and behavioral changes that affect daily life to varying degrees. These changes affect the behavioral domains of disorientation, social interaction, sleep disruption, house soiling, learning and memory, activity changes, and anxiety (DISHAA). We propose 3 severity stages. In mild CCDS, signs are subtle and of low frequency or severity, with preserved function. With progression, behavioral changes become more apparent and impactful, requiring management adjustments. In severe CCDS, debilitating deficits are overt, significantly impairing basic functions and necessitating comprehensive support. Two diagnostic levels are proposed. Level 1 is based on consistent history of progressive DISHAA signs, identification of alternate causes through physical, orthopedic, and neurologic examination and laboratory work; either normal neurologic examination or evidence of symmetrical, diffuse forebrain dysfunction; and persistence of signs following management of relevant comorbidities. Level 2 includes a brain MRI showing cortical atrophy with CSF cell counts within normal limits. Definitive postmortem histopathological confirmation rests on cortical atrophy, amyloid deposition, myelin loss, neuroinflammation, and amyloid angiopathy. Future priorities include the development of blood biomarkers and cognitive testing batteries for routine clinical settings, both of which will refine diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic monitoring.

Journal of the American Veterinary Medical AssociationVol. 264(4)
Eötvös Loránd University (HU), American Society of Clinical Oncology (US), North Carolina State University (US), University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation (DE), University of Washington (US), Cornell University (US), Animal Health Institute (US), Staples (Canada) (CA), Cognitive Neuroimaging Lab (FR), New York State College of Veterinary Medicine (US), Colorado State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
3.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.