All on the Same Page? Comparing European Populist Radical Right Governments’ Foreign Policy towards China

Abstract Do European populist radical right (EPRR) governments converge in their engagement with China? If not, what explains their divergence? While prior research has explored populist foreign policy, little attention has been paid to their China strategies or the factors shaping them once EPRR parties gain power. This study compares the differing approaches of three EPRR governments—Brothers of Italy, Law and Justice, and Fidesz—and argues that the variation stems from two factors: the intensity of transnational business interests sustaining economic interdependence with China, and the degree of foreign policy executive centralization. By empirically analyzing these cases, the paper contributes to debates on populist foreign policy and their relations with Beijing. It demonstrates that even governments sharing similar thick ideologies may diverge in practice, as institutional and contextual constraints shape the extent to which populist leaders can act on their partisan interests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foreign Policy Analysis
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/oraf037
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

All on the Same Page? Comparing European Populist Radical Right Governments’ Foreign Policy towards China

Lunting Wu
Foreign Policy Analysis
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
article

All on the Same Page? Comparing European Populist Radical Right Governments’ Foreign Policy towards China

Lunting Wu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Do European populist radical right (EPRR) governments converge in their engagement with China? If not, what explains their divergence? While prior research has explored populist foreign policy, little attention has been paid to their China strategies or the factors shaping them once EPRR parties gain power. This study compares the differing approaches of three EPRR governments—Brothers of Italy, Law and Justice, and Fidesz—and argues that the variation stems from two factors: the intensity of transnational business interests sustaining economic interdependence with China, and the degree of foreign policy executive centralization. By empirically analyzing these cases, the paper contributes to debates on populist foreign policy and their relations with Beijing. It demonstrates that even governments sharing similar thick ideologies may diverge in practice, as institutional and contextual constraints shape the extent to which populist leaders can act on their partisan interests.

Foreign Policy AnalysisVol. 22(1)
Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NO)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.