The Subjective Experience of Forced Psychiatric Medication: A Scoping Review Interpreted Through the Power Threat Meaning Framework

Forced psychiatric medication, administered without consent, is one of the most ethically contested practices in mental health care. While often justified through risk management and biomedical models, the voices of those subjected to it are frequently marginalised. This scoping review synthesises findings from 21 qualitative studies to explore individuals’ experiences of forced medication. The review identifies recurring themes of violence and dehumanisation, epistemic exclusion, protest and survival strategies, powerlessness, retrospective reframing, and a desire for alternatives. Interpreted through the Power Threat Meaning Framework, the review frames forced medication as a manifestation of systemic power that shapes emotional responses, meaning-making, and lived experience. Provisional psychopharmacological considerations are also proposed for future research to empirically examine, suggesting that coercive contexts may alter subjective drug responses. Taken together, these findings call for an epistemological shift towards rights-based, relational, and trauma-informed care surrounding medication use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Humanistic Psychology
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00221678251396670
Primary Topic
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Subjective Experience of Forced Psychiatric Medication: A Scoping Review Interpreted Through the Power Threat Meaning Framework

Mohammed Abdulhussein
Journal of Humanistic Psychology
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
article

The Subjective Experience of Forced Psychiatric Medication: A Scoping Review Interpreted Through the Power Threat Meaning Framework

Mohammed Abdulhussein
article en

Abstract

Forced psychiatric medication, administered without consent, is one of the most ethically contested practices in mental health care. While often justified through risk management and biomedical models, the voices of those subjected to it are frequently marginalised. This scoping review synthesises findings from 21 qualitative studies to explore individuals’ experiences of forced medication. The review identifies recurring themes of violence and dehumanisation, epistemic exclusion, protest and survival strategies, powerlessness, retrospective reframing, and a desire for alternatives. Interpreted through the Power Threat Meaning Framework, the review frames forced medication as a manifestation of systemic power that shapes emotional responses, meaning-making, and lived experience. Provisional psychopharmacological considerations are also proposed for future research to empirically examine, suggesting that coercive contexts may alter subjective drug responses. Taken together, these findings call for an epistemological shift towards rights-based, relational, and trauma-informed care surrounding medication use.

Journal of Humanistic Psychology
University of Roehampton (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Subjective Experience of Forced Psychiatric Medication: A Scoping Review Interpreted Through the Power Threat Meaning Framework — Mohammed Abdulhussein · Journal of Humanistic Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS