Testing the BIO-WELL scale in situ: measuring human wellbeing responses to biodiversity within forests

The benefits of nature for human health and wellbeing are well documented. However, nature is not homogenous, and there remains a gap in our understanding of the role biodiversity (the diversity within species, between species, and of ecosystems) plays specifically. BIO-WELL, a psychometric scale, asks people to consider themselves in a forest ( ex situ ), measuring human wellbeing across five domains for 17 biodiversity metric and attribute stem questions. Here, we adapt and validate BIO-WELL for use in situ with 510 participants in British forests during spring and summer. We found good internal consistency, and exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses reaffirmed 1-factor structures for most stem questions (construct validity); variability in model fit statistics for some of the biodiversity stem questions indicates uncertainty in how they were conceived by participants. We found strong concurrent validity, meaning the scale is suitable and reliable for use in situ . Perceived variety of sounds, smells, and colours were positively associated with BIO-WELL scores. People who felt visiting the outdoors was an important of their life also scored higher. Participants reported higher BIO-WELL scores in relation to the diversity of, and interactions between, species in spring compared to summer, which is perhaps attributable to seasonal differences in ecological processes. There was no difference in BIO-WELL scores between people who reported sensory impairments. The scale can be deployed to generate empirical evidence to support policy and practice decision-making for planning and managing natural environments for both biodiversity conservation and human wellbeing. • BIO-WELL is a scale used to better understand the wellbeing benefits of biodiversity • BIO-WELL shows validity and reliability when used in situ • Sounds, smells, and colours were positively associated with higher BIO-WELL scores • People who feel visiting outdoors is important to them had higher BIO-WELL scores • People with and without sensory impairments had comparable BIO-WELL scores in situ

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102897
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing the BIO-WELL scale in situ: measuring human wellbeing responses to biodiversity within forests

ZG Davies, K. N. Irvine, R.D. Fish, G.E. Austen et al.
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Urban Green Space and Health
article

Testing the BIO-WELL scale in situ: measuring human wellbeing responses to biodiversity within forests

ZG Davies, K. N. Irvine, R.D. Fish, G.E. Austen, L. Croager, M. Dallimer, F. Jones, J.C. Fisher, M. Nawrath
article en

Abstract

The benefits of nature for human health and wellbeing are well documented. However, nature is not homogenous, and there remains a gap in our understanding of the role biodiversity (the diversity within species, between species, and of ecosystems) plays specifically. BIO-WELL, a psychometric scale, asks people to consider themselves in a forest ( ex situ ), measuring human wellbeing across five domains for 17 biodiversity metric and attribute stem questions. Here, we adapt and validate BIO-WELL for use in situ with 510 participants in British forests during spring and summer. We found good internal consistency, and exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses reaffirmed 1-factor structures for most stem questions (construct validity); variability in model fit statistics for some of the biodiversity stem questions indicates uncertainty in how they were conceived by participants. We found strong concurrent validity, meaning the scale is suitable and reliable for use in situ . Perceived variety of sounds, smells, and colours were positively associated with BIO-WELL scores. People who felt visiting the outdoors was an important of their life also scored higher. Participants reported higher BIO-WELL scores in relation to the diversity of, and interactions between, species in spring compared to summer, which is perhaps attributable to seasonal differences in ecological processes. There was no difference in BIO-WELL scores between people who reported sensory impairments. The scale can be deployed to generate empirical evidence to support policy and practice decision-making for planning and managing natural environments for both biodiversity conservation and human wellbeing. • BIO-WELL is a scale used to better understand the wellbeing benefits of biodiversity • BIO-WELL shows validity and reliability when used in situ • Sounds, smells, and colours were positively associated with higher BIO-WELL scores • People who feel visiting outdoors is important to them had higher BIO-WELL scores • People with and without sensory impairments had comparable BIO-WELL scores in situ

Journal of Environmental PsychologyVol. 109
James Hutton Institute (GB), University of Kent (GB), Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NO), University of Oxford (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.