Dispensing practices issue shorter prescription lengths compared with non-dispensing practices: a quasi-experimental cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Dispensing practices, which have in-house dispensaries, are paid to dispense medications directly to patients. Evidence suggests that this financial incentive influences prescribing behaviour, although the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. AIM: To investigate the impact of dispensing status on prescription length in England. DESIGN & SETTING: Quasi-experimental, repeated-measures, cross-sectional study of English general practices. METHOD: Business administration data classified practices as dispensing or non-dispensing, determined the percentage of patients eligible for dispensing, and captured prescription lengths for seven drugs with fixed dosing regimens at 3-month intervals from July 2023 to April 2024. Generalised estimating equations analysed the relationship between dispensing status and the proportion of patients eligible for dispensing with average prescription length, controlling for patient and practice characteristics. RESULTS: Adjusting for patient and practice characteristics, dispensing practices prescribed shorter average lengths for all drugs. Desogestrel showed the largest difference (21.9 days shorter), followed by indapamide standard release (9.85 days), indapamide modified release (9.71 days), ezetimibe (8.41 days), tamsulosin (7.18 days), alendronic acid (6.63 days), and dapagliflozin (5.85 days). An increase in the proportion of patients eligible for dispensing was associated with significantly shorter prescription lengths across all drugs. Dispensing practices more consistently prescribed medications for 28-31 days, whereas non-dispensing practices showed greater variability. CONCLUSION: Dispensing practices are associated with shorter prescription lengths, increasing the number of prescriptions issued over time and the associated dispensing fee. The absence of clear guidance on prescription lengths likely contributes to this variability. Central bodies should consider providing explicit recommendations to optimise prescription durations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.124355
Primary Topic
Medication Adherence and Compliance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dispensing practices issue shorter prescription lengths compared with non-dispensing practices: a quasi-experimental cross-sectional study.

Cameron Appel, Ian Holdroyd, Efthalia Massou, John Ford et al.
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Medication Adherence and Compliance
article

Dispensing practices issue shorter prescription lengths compared with non-dispensing practices: a quasi-experimental cross-sectional study.

Cameron Appel, Ian Holdroyd, Efthalia Massou, John Ford, Liam Loftus
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dispensing practices, which have in-house dispensaries, are paid to dispense medications directly to patients. Evidence suggests that this financial incentive influences prescribing behaviour, although the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. AIM: To investigate the impact of dispensing status on prescription length in England. DESIGN & SETTING: Quasi-experimental, repeated-measures, cross-sectional study of English general practices. METHOD: Business administration data classified practices as dispensing or non-dispensing, determined the percentage of patients eligible for dispensing, and captured prescription lengths for seven drugs with fixed dosing regimens at 3-month intervals from July 2023 to April 2024. Generalised estimating equations analysed the relationship between dispensing status and the proportion of patients eligible for dispensing with average prescription length, controlling for patient and practice characteristics. RESULTS: Adjusting for patient and practice characteristics, dispensing practices prescribed shorter average lengths for all drugs. Desogestrel showed the largest difference (21.9 days shorter), followed by indapamide standard release (9.85 days), indapamide modified release (9.71 days), ezetimibe (8.41 days), tamsulosin (7.18 days), alendronic acid (6.63 days), and dapagliflozin (5.85 days). An increase in the proportion of patients eligible for dispensing was associated with significantly shorter prescription lengths across all drugs. Dispensing practices more consistently prescribed medications for 28-31 days, whereas non-dispensing practices showed greater variability. CONCLUSION: Dispensing practices are associated with shorter prescription lengths, increasing the number of prescriptions issued over time and the associated dispensing fee. The absence of clear guidance on prescription lengths likely contributes to this variability. Central bodies should consider providing explicit recommendations to optimise prescription durations.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Medication Adherence and Compliance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.