Effects of naturalistic housing conditions on amphibian growth and microbiome in captivity

Animals in captivity are inherently separated from their natural environments, which both exposes them to new heterospecific organisms as well as reduces contact with naturally occurring predators, prey or microbiota. The microbes that live on and in animals are increasingly recognized as having important impacts on animal health, development and behavior. We raised post-metamorphic treefrogs in 1) naturalistic containers in groups, 2) regularly sterilized containers in groups, or 3) regularly sterilized containers but solitary. Froglets were raised for over eight months; in addition to monitoring growth and development, we collected fecal samples on three occasions, gut samples on two occasions, and skin swab samples once. We compared the diversity of microbial communities across sample types and over time. Froglets raised in group housing, either naturalistic or regularly cleaned, had the fastest growth and sexual differentiation, but naturalistic housing also improved survival. Alpha diversity of bacteria on the skin or in the gut did not vary with rearing conditions, whereas diversity in the gut increased over time. Alpha diversity of feces did vary with rearing treatment and changed over time. Bacterial community composition (beta diversity) varied most strongly with sample type, but also with rearing conditions and over time. In addition, bacterial communities of feces were highly correlated with those of guts, indicating that feces can serve as an accurate and non-invasive biomarker of the gut microbiome. Lastly, transferring frogs from regularly sterilized environments to naturalistic vivaria improved bacterial community diversity. Our study suggests that naturalistic housing improves the overall health and development of captive amphibians and that these improvements may occur by facilitating a more stable and diverse microbiome.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animal Microbiome
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-025-00491-z
Primary Topic
Amphibian and Reptile Biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of naturalistic housing conditions on amphibian growth and microbiome in captivity

Justin C. Touchon, Myra C. Hughey
Animal Microbiome
Amphibian and Reptile Biology
article

Effects of naturalistic housing conditions on amphibian growth and microbiome in captivity

Justin C. Touchon, Myra C. Hughey
article en

Abstract

Animals in captivity are inherently separated from their natural environments, which both exposes them to new heterospecific organisms as well as reduces contact with naturally occurring predators, prey or microbiota. The microbes that live on and in animals are increasingly recognized as having important impacts on animal health, development and behavior. We raised post-metamorphic treefrogs in 1) naturalistic containers in groups, 2) regularly sterilized containers in groups, or 3) regularly sterilized containers but solitary. Froglets were raised for over eight months; in addition to monitoring growth and development, we collected fecal samples on three occasions, gut samples on two occasions, and skin swab samples once. We compared the diversity of microbial communities across sample types and over time. Froglets raised in group housing, either naturalistic or regularly cleaned, had the fastest growth and sexual differentiation, but naturalistic housing also improved survival. Alpha diversity of bacteria on the skin or in the gut did not vary with rearing conditions, whereas diversity in the gut increased over time. Alpha diversity of feces did vary with rearing treatment and changed over time. Bacterial community composition (beta diversity) varied most strongly with sample type, but also with rearing conditions and over time. In addition, bacterial communities of feces were highly correlated with those of guts, indicating that feces can serve as an accurate and non-invasive biomarker of the gut microbiome. Lastly, transferring frogs from regularly sterilized environments to naturalistic vivaria improved bacterial community diversity. Our study suggests that naturalistic housing improves the overall health and development of captive amphibians and that these improvements may occur by facilitating a more stable and diverse microbiome.

Animal MicrobiomeVol. 7(1)
Vassar College (US)
Vassar College
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Amphibian and Reptile Biology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effects of naturalistic housing conditions on amphibian growth and microbiome in captivity — Justin C. Touchon, Myra C. Hughey · Animal Microbiome (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS