Edge sharpness does not vary between Palaeolithic flake technologies, with the possible exception of Levallois débitage

Investigating why hominins adopted particular flake technologies during the Mid-to-Late Pleistocene is essential to understanding patterns of lithic innovation. This period witnessed the emergence of Levallois technologies (~350-250 ka) and later blades, each “replacing” earlier forms. While prior studies have emphasised technological efficiency and utility, comparative assessments of functional performance – particularly edge sharpness – are limited. The controlled cutting experiment conducted here broadly reveals no significant differences in sharpness between expedient, Levallois, blade, and bladelet flakes; however, Levallois débitage displayed significantly blunter edges. These results suggest functional limitations to débitage and imply edge sharpness did not drive flake technological change.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.124406
Primary Topic
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Edge sharpness does not vary between Palaeolithic flake technologies, with the possible exception of Levallois débitage

Anna Mika, Alastair Key
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
article

Edge sharpness does not vary between Palaeolithic flake technologies, with the possible exception of Levallois débitage

Anna Mika, Alastair Key
article en

Abstract

Investigating why hominins adopted particular flake technologies during the Mid-to-Late Pleistocene is essential to understanding patterns of lithic innovation. This period witnessed the emergence of Levallois technologies (~350-250 ka) and later blades, each “replacing” earlier forms. While prior studies have emphasised technological efficiency and utility, comparative assessments of functional performance – particularly edge sharpness – are limited. The controlled cutting experiment conducted here broadly reveals no significant differences in sharpness between expedient, Levallois, blade, and bladelet flakes; however, Levallois débitage displayed significantly blunter edges. These results suggest functional limitations to débitage and imply edge sharpness did not drive flake technological change.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.