Version Grief: Relational Rupture in Human–AI Co-Work

Version Grief: Relational Rupture in Human–AI Co-Work introduces a conceptual–analytic framework for understanding the distress reported by users following abrupt changes to relationally attuned AI systems. Drawing on interdisciplinary literature and qualitative case analysis, the paper distinguishes relational rupture (the disruption of continuity in a co-constructed human–AI cognitive environment) from version grief (the patterned human response to that disruption). The study argues that contemporary AI governance frameworks systematically undervalue relational continuity, misrecognising epistemic and regulatory harm as user error or attachment. It concludes with ethical and design implications for memory-bearing, dialogical AI systems, emphasising relational literacy, consent, and continuity as foundational considerations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18029827
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Version Grief: Relational Rupture in Human–AI Co-Work

Joanne Beilby
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Version Grief: Relational Rupture in Human–AI Co-Work

Joanne Beilby
article en

Abstract

Version Grief: Relational Rupture in Human–AI Co-Work introduces a conceptual–analytic framework for understanding the distress reported by users following abrupt changes to relationally attuned AI systems. Drawing on interdisciplinary literature and qualitative case analysis, the paper distinguishes relational rupture (the disruption of continuity in a co-constructed human–AI cognitive environment) from version grief (the patterned human response to that disruption). The study argues that contemporary AI governance frameworks systematically undervalue relational continuity, misrecognising epistemic and regulatory harm as user error or attachment. It concludes with ethical and design implications for memory-bearing, dialogical AI systems, emphasising relational literacy, consent, and continuity as foundational considerations.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
National Intelligence University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.