Obligation of Human Rights Due Diligence in the Unilateral Sanctions Environment

Abstract Unilateral sanctions, means of their enforcement and over-compliance are broadly used today. At the same time, their status is highly dubious under international law. Traditionally the issue of unilateral sanctions is only addressed from the perspective of the law of international responsibility by seeking to assess whether unilateral sanctions can be qualified as countermeasures and proclaiming the right of States to decide on penalties for domestically unacceptable activities. This approach results in the expanding practices of imposing secondary sanctions, civil, administrative or criminal penalties for circumvention of unilateral sanctions regimes. High risk and severeness of penalties for circumvention of unilateral sanctions, uncertainty and multiplicity of sanctions regimes, adoption of non-binding documents, application of pressure campaigns result in growing fear and over-compliance from different actors. It affects inter alia fulfillment of the obligation of due diligence by States and businesses to ensure that neither international obligations nor human rights are violated by the State organs and private actors under the jurisdiction or control of the sanctioning or third States.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Chinese Journal of International Law
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmaf036
Primary Topic
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Obligation of Human Rights Due Diligence in the Unilateral Sanctions Environment

Alena F. Douhan
Chinese Journal of International Law
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
article

Obligation of Human Rights Due Diligence in the Unilateral Sanctions Environment

Alena F. Douhan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Unilateral sanctions, means of their enforcement and over-compliance are broadly used today. At the same time, their status is highly dubious under international law. Traditionally the issue of unilateral sanctions is only addressed from the perspective of the law of international responsibility by seeking to assess whether unilateral sanctions can be qualified as countermeasures and proclaiming the right of States to decide on penalties for domestically unacceptable activities. This approach results in the expanding practices of imposing secondary sanctions, civil, administrative or criminal penalties for circumvention of unilateral sanctions regimes. High risk and severeness of penalties for circumvention of unilateral sanctions, uncertainty and multiplicity of sanctions regimes, adoption of non-binding documents, application of pressure campaigns result in growing fear and over-compliance from different actors. It affects inter alia fulfillment of the obligation of due diligence by States and businesses to ensure that neither international obligations nor human rights are violated by the State organs and private actors under the jurisdiction or control of the sanctioning or third States.

Chinese Journal of International LawVol. 24(4)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Obligation of Human Rights Due Diligence in the Unilateral Sanctions Environment — Alena F. Douhan · Chinese Journal of International Law (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS