Questioning the Usefulness of Stimulation Rate Changes to Optimize Perception in Cochlear Implant Users

Research exploring the impact of stimulation rate modifications on perception in cochlear implant users continues to expand. The existing body of research remains contradictory, making it difficult to establish a clear consensus that could inform clinical recommendations. In this context, this article aims to question the usefulness of such adjustments as a clinical intervention beyond the initial fitting, particularly for optimizing non-speech processing. To do so, we combined an overview of the existing literature on the effects of stimulation-rate changes on speech and non-speech processing with a discussion of observational data. The current evidence base is sparse, often contradictory, and affected by interoperability challenges that limit cross-study comparability. Consequently, it is not possible to formulate robust, evidence-based clinical recommendations at this time. Clinicians should be cautious about implementing stimulation-rate adjustments beyond the initial fitting and should wait for more robust evidence to emerge before considering such changes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Audiology Research
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres16010006
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Questioning the Usefulness of Stimulation Rate Changes to Optimize Perception in Cochlear Implant Users

Andréanne Sharp, Julie Dufour, François Champoux, Benoit-Antoine Bacon et al.
Audiology Research
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Questioning the Usefulness of Stimulation Rate Changes to Optimize Perception in Cochlear Implant Users

Andréanne Sharp, Julie Dufour, François Champoux, Benoit-Antoine Bacon, Daniel Beaudoin
article en

Abstract

Research exploring the impact of stimulation rate modifications on perception in cochlear implant users continues to expand. The existing body of research remains contradictory, making it difficult to establish a clear consensus that could inform clinical recommendations. In this context, this article aims to question the usefulness of such adjustments as a clinical intervention beyond the initial fitting, particularly for optimizing non-speech processing. To do so, we combined an overview of the existing literature on the effects of stimulation-rate changes on speech and non-speech processing with a discussion of observational data. The current evidence base is sparse, often contradictory, and affected by interoperability challenges that limit cross-study comparability. Consequently, it is not possible to formulate robust, evidence-based clinical recommendations at this time. Clinicians should be cautious about implementing stimulation-rate adjustments beyond the initial fitting and should wait for more robust evidence to emerge before considering such changes.

Audiology ResearchVol. 16(1)
University of British Columbia (CA), Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal (CA), Université Laval (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)
Université de Montréal, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Questioning the Usefulness of Stimulation Rate Changes to Optimize Perception in Cochlear Implant Users — Andréanne Sharp, Julie Dufour, et al. · Audiology Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS