Fundamentals of Shared Decision-Making in Surgery

Abstract Shared decision-making (SDM) is a cornerstone of patient-centered care, particularly in colorectal surgery where treatment decisions often involve complex tradeoffs. This review outlines the principles, benefits, and challenges of SDM in surgical contexts, emphasizing its role in aligning clinical decisions with patient values. SDM enhances patient knowledge, reduces decisional conflict and regret, and improves satisfaction and adherence. It also offers systemic benefits, including reduced preference-sensitive surgeries and potential cost savings. Despite its promise, barriers such as limited health literacy, time constraints, and clinician discomfort with uncertainty hinder implementation. The review highlights validated tools and frameworks for studying SDM and explores the evolving role of decision aids in colorectal cancer care. Future research should focus on pragmatic, mixed-methods trials, and integration of SDM metrics into clinical workflows. Advancing SDM in colorectal surgery requires sustained efforts in clinician training, patient engagement, and culturally sensitive communication strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2760-6659
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fundamentals of Shared Decision-Making in Surgery

Keren Ladin, Sungshin Na
Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

Fundamentals of Shared Decision-Making in Surgery

Keren Ladin, Sungshin Na
article en

Abstract

Abstract Shared decision-making (SDM) is a cornerstone of patient-centered care, particularly in colorectal surgery where treatment decisions often involve complex tradeoffs. This review outlines the principles, benefits, and challenges of SDM in surgical contexts, emphasizing its role in aligning clinical decisions with patient values. SDM enhances patient knowledge, reduces decisional conflict and regret, and improves satisfaction and adherence. It also offers systemic benefits, including reduced preference-sensitive surgeries and potential cost savings. Despite its promise, barriers such as limited health literacy, time constraints, and clinician discomfort with uncertainty hinder implementation. The review highlights validated tools and frameworks for studying SDM and explores the evolving role of decision aids in colorectal cancer care. Future research should focus on pragmatic, mixed-methods trials, and integration of SDM metrics into clinical workflows. Advancing SDM in colorectal surgery requires sustained efforts in clinician training, patient engagement, and culturally sensitive communication strategies.

Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery
Tufts University (US), Lahey Hospital and Medical Center (US), Lahey Medical Center (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fundamentals of Shared Decision-Making in Surgery — Keren Ladin, Sungshin Na · Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS