Internationally educated health professionals and health-system change: A global qualitative study

This article examines how internationally educated health professionals contribute to health system change on return to their countries of origin. Rather than treating return as reintegration or skill application, this study approaches it as interpretive, constrained engagement within health systems. Drawing on interviews with 52 returnees from 43 countries and a comparison group of 14 nationally educated peers, and using an abductive realist thematic analysis, the study identifies four pathways: policy influence, community engagement, infrastructural innovation, and medical education, through which returnees engaged systems. These are underpinned by three mechanisms: reflexive agency, knowledge translation, and civic understanding. What distinguishes returnees is not exclusive access to insight, but the configuration of stance, tempo, scope, and resources. Non-mobile peers contributed through equally committed, often slower and more embedded strategies. The findings challenge instrumental framings of return as skill deployment. International education is understood as a catalytic influence that interacts with home-grown formation to shape how professionals interpret structural conditions, navigate constraints, and assume responsibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Public Health
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2025.2607849
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Health Workforce Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Internationally educated health professionals and health-system change: A global qualitative study

Maia Chankseliani
1 citations
Global Public Health
Global Health Workforce Issues
2.52
article

Internationally educated health professionals and health-system change: A global qualitative study

Maia Chankseliani
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article examines how internationally educated health professionals contribute to health system change on return to their countries of origin. Rather than treating return as reintegration or skill application, this study approaches it as interpretive, constrained engagement within health systems. Drawing on interviews with 52 returnees from 43 countries and a comparison group of 14 nationally educated peers, and using an abductive realist thematic analysis, the study identifies four pathways: policy influence, community engagement, infrastructural innovation, and medical education, through which returnees engaged systems. These are underpinned by three mechanisms: reflexive agency, knowledge translation, and civic understanding. What distinguishes returnees is not exclusive access to insight, but the configuration of stance, tempo, scope, and resources. Non-mobile peers contributed through equally committed, often slower and more embedded strategies. The findings challenge instrumental framings of return as skill deployment. International education is understood as a catalytic influence that interacts with home-grown formation to shape how professionals interpret structural conditions, navigate constraints, and assume responsibility.

Global Public HealthVol. 21(1)
University of Oxford (GB)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Global Health Workforce Issues
2.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.