Gender bias in scientific recognition: Presence and evolution of women in research awards in Spain (2000–2023)

This study analyses the presence and evolution of female scientists in research awards in Spain between 2000 and 2023, addressing under-representation and systematic gender biases that disadvantage women in the recognition of scientific achievements. Based on a unique sample of 171 different research awards in all fields of knowledge, totalling 4062 prize winners, the analysis of the 24-year time frame studied reveals an average 31.6% increase in awards to women over the period as a whole, nearing the 40% threshold for accolades received in the final years considered. This is thus similar to the percentage of female representation within the field of science in Spain. Despite this overall progress, awards for women are less prominent than those given to men, wherein they receive 39.5% of prizes for specific works, but only 25.1% of career awards, regarded as more prestigious. Until now, no study for a European country has involved the analysis of such a large sample over time as the one presented here, and it clearly indicates how gender inequalities have been progressively reduced in the more than two decades studied, but they still persist in particular in relation to the most distinguished awards. The data shown here may favour informed decision-making on the part of public authorities, encouraging greater recognition of women scientists.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Women s Studies
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13505068251397870
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender bias in scientific recognition: Presence and evolution of women in research awards in Spain (2000–2023)

Álvaro Cabezas-Clavijo, Juana Salido-Fernández
European Journal of Women s Studies
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

Gender bias in scientific recognition: Presence and evolution of women in research awards in Spain (2000–2023)

Álvaro Cabezas-Clavijo, Juana Salido-Fernández
article en

Abstract

This study analyses the presence and evolution of female scientists in research awards in Spain between 2000 and 2023, addressing under-representation and systematic gender biases that disadvantage women in the recognition of scientific achievements. Based on a unique sample of 171 different research awards in all fields of knowledge, totalling 4062 prize winners, the analysis of the 24-year time frame studied reveals an average 31.6% increase in awards to women over the period as a whole, nearing the 40% threshold for accolades received in the final years considered. This is thus similar to the percentage of female representation within the field of science in Spain. Despite this overall progress, awards for women are less prominent than those given to men, wherein they receive 39.5% of prizes for specific works, but only 25.1% of career awards, regarded as more prestigious. Until now, no study for a European country has involved the analysis of such a large sample over time as the one presented here, and it clearly indicates how gender inequalities have been progressively reduced in the more than two decades studied, but they still persist in particular in relation to the most distinguished awards. The data shown here may favour informed decision-making on the part of public authorities, encouraging greater recognition of women scientists.

European Journal of Women s StudiesVol. 33(1)
Universidad Internacional De La Rioja (ES)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.