Decreased rates of subsidence with a specific modular, fluted, tapered femoral revision stem

Studies have noted high rates of subsidence >5mm in modular, fluted, tapered (MFT) stems used in femoral revision. These rates may be high due to evaluation of all MFT stems as a group; we present improved subsidence data using a single stem. We reviewed revision hip arthroplasty cases using the DePuy RECLAIM MFT stem. Postoperative radiographs were compared with most recent follow-up radiographs to measure subsidence. 124 patients were reviewed. 10 were lost to follow-up, and one was excluded for surgical error, leaving 113 patients. Average subsidence was 0.44mm, range 0-4.20mm. Average subsidence in female and male populations were 0.40mm and 0.49mm, respectively; the difference was not significant. There were no reoperations. The subsidence data for MFT stems presented in the literature is higher than our experience. This difference may be attributable to implant design, and future studies may benefit from stratification by manufacturer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic Reports
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jorep.2025.100879
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decreased rates of subsidence with a specific modular, fluted, tapered femoral revision stem

Nadia Baichoo, Joel Politi, Kevin C. Chang, James A. Germano
Journal of Orthopaedic Reports
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
article

Decreased rates of subsidence with a specific modular, fluted, tapered femoral revision stem

Nadia Baichoo, Joel Politi, Kevin C. Chang, James A. Germano
article en

Abstract

Studies have noted high rates of subsidence >5mm in modular, fluted, tapered (MFT) stems used in femoral revision. These rates may be high due to evaluation of all MFT stems as a group; we present improved subsidence data using a single stem. We reviewed revision hip arthroplasty cases using the DePuy RECLAIM MFT stem. Postoperative radiographs were compared with most recent follow-up radiographs to measure subsidence. 124 patients were reviewed. 10 were lost to follow-up, and one was excluded for surgical error, leaving 113 patients. Average subsidence was 0.44mm, range 0-4.20mm. Average subsidence in female and male populations were 0.40mm and 0.49mm, respectively; the difference was not significant. There were no reoperations. The subsidence data for MFT stems presented in the literature is higher than our experience. This difference may be attributable to implant design, and future studies may benefit from stratification by manufacturer.

Journal of Orthopaedic Reports
Orthopedic Center (US), Huntington Hospital (US), Orthopedic One (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.