Виклики гуманітарної дипломатії у захисті військовополонених

The article provides a generalized analysis of the shortcomings in the functioning of humanitarian diplomacy institutions in the field of protecting the rights and freedoms of prisoners of war. It is noted that, in general, the war in Ukraine actualizes deep ideological and legal concepts of justice, dignity, and universal human values under conditions of armed conflict, and requires a comprehensive approach to their realization. At the same time, the situation in the conflict zone poses a serious challenge to existing human rights mechanisms in ensuring effective protection. Safeguarding the inalienable rights of prisoners of war requires not only appropriate legal regulation but also the practical implementation of these norms under the difficult conditions of armed conflict. It is emphasized that the protection of the life and health of prisoners of war belongs to the canonical imperatives of ethics, embodied in the normative acts of international humanitarian law. This imperative obligation, based on the principle of the inviolability of the human person, reflects the highest anthropological ideals. However, contemporary reality demonstrates the insufficient effectiveness of these normative principles in the context of ongoing armed conflicts. Violations of the rights of prisoners of war, unfortunately, have become commonplace, which necessitates the improvement and strengthening of mechanisms for their protection. The main task of the humanitarian community and the state, seeking to stabilize the situation in the conflict zone, is to ensure elementary or “minimum” standards of humanity in military conflicts, including with regard to prisoners of war. This requires a comprehensive approach that involves not only a strong regulatory framework but also the active participation of international organizations, civil society, and humanitarian institutions. One of the key directions in this regard is the establishment of independent monitoring of the conditions of detention and treatment of prisoners of war. An analysis of the practice of international and national “humanitarian diplomacy” in the context of the ongoing war in Ukraine has made it possible to identify a number of significant problems in the protection of prisoners of war’s rights, in particular: limited access of representatives of “humanitarian diplomacy” to specific territories or groups of prisoners of war and the camps where they are held; possible financial constraints of missions due to the scarcity of resources for humanitarian assistance; political pressure and restrictions imposed on “humanitarian missions,” which undermine the principles of neutrality and independence of humanitarian aid; and security threats to the personnel of these institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy
Published
2025-12-22
Primary Topic
War, Law, and Justice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Виклики гуманітарної дипломатії у захисті військовополонених

Ю. Гелемей, В. Ковальчук
The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy
War, Law, and Justice
article

Виклики гуманітарної дипломатії у захисті військовополонених

Ю. Гелемей, В. Ковальчук
article en

Abstract

The article provides a generalized analysis of the shortcomings in the functioning of humanitarian diplomacy institutions in the field of protecting the rights and freedoms of prisoners of war. It is noted that, in general, the war in Ukraine actualizes deep ideological and legal concepts of justice, dignity, and universal human values under conditions of armed conflict, and requires a comprehensive approach to their realization. At the same time, the situation in the conflict zone poses a serious challenge to existing human rights mechanisms in ensuring effective protection. Safeguarding the inalienable rights of prisoners of war requires not only appropriate legal regulation but also the practical implementation of these norms under the difficult conditions of armed conflict. It is emphasized that the protection of the life and health of prisoners of war belongs to the canonical imperatives of ethics, embodied in the normative acts of international humanitarian law. This imperative obligation, based on the principle of the inviolability of the human person, reflects the highest anthropological ideals. However, contemporary reality demonstrates the insufficient effectiveness of these normative principles in the context of ongoing armed conflicts. Violations of the rights of prisoners of war, unfortunately, have become commonplace, which necessitates the improvement and strengthening of mechanisms for their protection. The main task of the humanitarian community and the state, seeking to stabilize the situation in the conflict zone, is to ensure elementary or “minimum” standards of humanity in military conflicts, including with regard to prisoners of war. This requires a comprehensive approach that involves not only a strong regulatory framework but also the active participation of international organizations, civil society, and humanitarian institutions. One of the key directions in this regard is the establishment of independent monitoring of the conditions of detention and treatment of prisoners of war. An analysis of the practice of international and national “humanitarian diplomacy” in the context of the ongoing war in Ukraine has made it possible to identify a number of significant problems in the protection of prisoners of war’s rights, in particular: limited access of representatives of “humanitarian diplomacy” to specific territories or groups of prisoners of war and the camps where they are held; possible financial constraints of missions due to the scarcity of resources for humanitarian assistance; political pressure and restrictions imposed on “humanitarian missions,” which undermine the principles of neutrality and independence of humanitarian aid; and security threats to the personnel of these institutions.

The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy
Lviv Polytechnic National University (UA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
War, Law, and Justice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.