Optimal Inter-Session Intervals in Neurofeedback Training: A Randomized Trial of Retention and Individual Response Patterns in Elite Judo Athletes

Background: Neurofeedback training (NFT) enhances athletic performance through alpha modulation, but optimal inter-session intervals and individual response variability remain poorly understood. Objective: This is the first randomized controlled trial to systematically compare neurofeedback periodization (2-day vs. 3-day inter-session intervals) on neurophysiological adaptations, strength performance, and retention in elite judo athletes. Methods: Thirty-one national-level judokas completed 15 alpha enhancement sessions in 2-day (n = 12), 3-day (n = 12), or control (n = 7) groups, receiving pseudo-neurofeedback with randomized, non-contingent feedback. Primary outcomes included Frontal Alpha Index changes (ΔFAI; frontal alpha power modulation ratio) and squat performance (35–100% 1RM), with secondary assessment of 48/72 h retention and response phenotypes. Results: Mean ΔFAI was modest (E15G-2d: 0.005 ± 0.205; E15G-3d: 0.052 ± 0.202), with early peak responses followed by stabilization. E15G-3d demonstrated superior retention (90.2 ± 3.4% at 72 h vs. 76.8 ± 4.1% at 48 h; p < 0.001) despite similar peaks. Both training groups showed significant strength improvements versus controls (E15G-2d: 2.37 ± 0.66 reps; E15G-3d: 2.00 ± 0.53 reps), yet neurophysiological-performance correlations were non-significant (p > 0.072), indicating strength adaptations via mechanisms independent of alpha modulation. Three response phenotypes emerged (high: 29.0%, moderate: 51.6%, low: 19.4%), representing the first empirical classification of neurofeedback responsiveness in athletes. Conclusions: Three-day intervals uniquely optimize retention through enhanced consolidation, establishing evidence-based periodization guidelines for elite athletes. The dissociation between neural and performance adaptations challenges traditional neurofeedback theory, while individual heterogeneity necessitates personalized protocols for optimal NFT periodization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16010142
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimal Inter-Session Intervals in Neurofeedback Training: A Randomized Trial of Retention and Individual Response Patterns in Elite Judo Athletes

Jarosław Markowski, Ján Pilch, Alicja Markiel, Dariusz Skalski et al.
Applied Sciences
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Optimal Inter-Session Intervals in Neurofeedback Training: A Randomized Trial of Retention and Individual Response Patterns in Elite Judo Athletes

Jarosław Markowski, Ján Pilch, Alicja Markiel, Dariusz Skalski, Adam Zajac, Adam Maszczyk
article en

Abstract

Background: Neurofeedback training (NFT) enhances athletic performance through alpha modulation, but optimal inter-session intervals and individual response variability remain poorly understood. Objective: This is the first randomized controlled trial to systematically compare neurofeedback periodization (2-day vs. 3-day inter-session intervals) on neurophysiological adaptations, strength performance, and retention in elite judo athletes. Methods: Thirty-one national-level judokas completed 15 alpha enhancement sessions in 2-day (n = 12), 3-day (n = 12), or control (n = 7) groups, receiving pseudo-neurofeedback with randomized, non-contingent feedback. Primary outcomes included Frontal Alpha Index changes (ΔFAI; frontal alpha power modulation ratio) and squat performance (35–100% 1RM), with secondary assessment of 48/72 h retention and response phenotypes. Results: Mean ΔFAI was modest (E15G-2d: 0.005 ± 0.205; E15G-3d: 0.052 ± 0.202), with early peak responses followed by stabilization. E15G-3d demonstrated superior retention (90.2 ± 3.4% at 72 h vs. 76.8 ± 4.1% at 48 h; p < 0.001) despite similar peaks. Both training groups showed significant strength improvements versus controls (E15G-2d: 2.37 ± 0.66 reps; E15G-3d: 2.00 ± 0.53 reps), yet neurophysiological-performance correlations were non-significant (p > 0.072), indicating strength adaptations via mechanisms independent of alpha modulation. Three response phenotypes emerged (high: 29.0%, moderate: 51.6%, low: 19.4%), representing the first empirical classification of neurofeedback responsiveness in athletes. Conclusions: Three-day intervals uniquely optimize retention through enhanced consolidation, establishing evidence-based periodization guidelines for elite athletes. The dissociation between neural and performance adaptations challenges traditional neurofeedback theory, while individual heterogeneity necessitates personalized protocols for optimal NFT periodization.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(1)
Medical University of Silesia (PL), Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport (PL), Akademii Wychowania Fizycznego im. Jerzego Kukuczki w Katowicach (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.