Between Brussels and Beijing: Strategic Choices for the GCC Member States in the Era of Fourth Energy Transition

This article examines the evolving strategic choices of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states as they navigate renewable energy partnerships with two major global actors, namely the European Union (EU) and China, against the backdrop of the securitization of the fourth energy transition after 2022. The study situates Gulf decision-making within a transformed geopolitical context, where energy transition has become both an environmental imperative and a pillar of national security policy in Europe, China, and the Gulf. Using a comparative SWOT framework supported by original data on foreign direct investment, EPC contracting, and equipment supply, the analysis contrasts the EU’s technology- and regulation-driven model with China’s cost-competitive, rapidly deployable solutions. It explores how GCC states balance immediate needs for scalable, affordable green technologies, largely supplied by China, with future-oriented investments in European renewable markets to secure technology access and hedge against long-term hydrocarbon demand decline. The article also highlights the political, economic, and technological risks of overreliance on either partner. It concludes that the GCC’s green energy strategy reflects a broader balancing act in an era of great power rivalry, leveraging both EU and Chinese engagement to diversify partnerships, safeguard economic resilience, and maintain strategic flexibility in the era of global energy transition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alternatives Global Local Political
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754251409476
Primary Topic
Global Energy Security and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Between Brussels and Beijing: Strategic Choices for the GCC Member States in the Era of Fourth Energy Transition

Nikolay Kozhanov, Şaban Kardaş
Alternatives Global Local Political
Global Energy Security and Policy
article

Between Brussels and Beijing: Strategic Choices for the GCC Member States in the Era of Fourth Energy Transition

Nikolay Kozhanov, Şaban Kardaş
article en

Abstract

This article examines the evolving strategic choices of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states as they navigate renewable energy partnerships with two major global actors, namely the European Union (EU) and China, against the backdrop of the securitization of the fourth energy transition after 2022. The study situates Gulf decision-making within a transformed geopolitical context, where energy transition has become both an environmental imperative and a pillar of national security policy in Europe, China, and the Gulf. Using a comparative SWOT framework supported by original data on foreign direct investment, EPC contracting, and equipment supply, the analysis contrasts the EU’s technology- and regulation-driven model with China’s cost-competitive, rapidly deployable solutions. It explores how GCC states balance immediate needs for scalable, affordable green technologies, largely supplied by China, with future-oriented investments in European renewable markets to secure technology access and hedge against long-term hydrocarbon demand decline. The article also highlights the political, economic, and technological risks of overreliance on either partner. It concludes that the GCC’s green energy strategy reflects a broader balancing act in an era of great power rivalry, leveraging both EU and Chinese engagement to diversify partnerships, safeguard economic resilience, and maintain strategic flexibility in the era of global energy transition.

Alternatives Global Local Political
Qatar University (QA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Global Energy Security and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.