Customer-Perceived Service Performance of Private Utility Partners under NEDA-Guided Joint Venture Agreements with Water Districts

Joint Venture Agreements (JVAs) between water districts and private partners have become common in the Philippines to improve water service delivery in the recent years. However, public complaints and pre-termination of contracts raise questions about whether these partnerships achieve their intended objectives. This study evaluates service performance of private partners in JVA-operated water districts through customer perceptions and regulatory compliance assessment under the 2023 NEDA Guidelines. Using the SERVPERF model, data were collected from 264 customers across 19 provinces through snowball sampling. The questionnaire measured five service dimensions: tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy on a seven-point likert scale. Pearson correlation and multiple regression analysis examined relationships between SERVPERF dimensions and customer satisfaction. Commission on Audit (COA) reports from six water districts were analyzed to assess alignment with NEDA Guidelines and integrated with survey data. Results reveal all five SERVPERF dimensions scored below moderate levels. Reliability received the lowest rating (M = 2.98), followed by Tangibles (M = 3.28) and Empathy (M = 3.32). Regression analysis showed all dimensions significantly predict satisfaction (R² = 0.861), with Empathy (? = 0.407) and Reliability (? = 0.288) as strongest predictors. COA findings revealed systemic violations: failure to submit mandatory reports, failure to install water service connection, water quality violations, high non-revenue water rate, unverifiable capital expenditures, and chronic operational deficiencies since 2019. Integration of survey and audit data demonstrates that operational failures directly correspond to poor customer perceptions. The findings indicate significant discrepancy between NEDA Guidelines and actual JVA implementation. Weak monitoring and inadequate enforcement allow poor performance to persist. Current JVA arrangements fail to improve water service delivery, with the most important dimensions to customers (Empathy and Reliability) being areas where private partners perform worst. Systemic reforms in enforcement of projects, clearer penalties and financial transparency are necessary to ensure these partnerships serve public welfare rather than private interests.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Iconic Research and Engineering Journals
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64388/irev9i6-1713063
Primary Topic
Public-Private Partnership Projects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Customer-Perceived Service Performance of Private Utility Partners under NEDA-Guided Joint Venture Agreements with Water Districts

Paul Daniel C. De Leon, Ph.D. Marvin O. Mallari
Iconic Research and Engineering Journals
Public-Private Partnership Projects
article

Customer-Perceived Service Performance of Private Utility Partners under NEDA-Guided Joint Venture Agreements with Water Districts

Paul Daniel C. De Leon, Ph.D. Marvin O. Mallari
article en

Abstract

Joint Venture Agreements (JVAs) between water districts and private partners have become common in the Philippines to improve water service delivery in the recent years. However, public complaints and pre-termination of contracts raise questions about whether these partnerships achieve their intended objectives. This study evaluates service performance of private partners in JVA-operated water districts through customer perceptions and regulatory compliance assessment under the 2023 NEDA Guidelines. Using the SERVPERF model, data were collected from 264 customers across 19 provinces through snowball sampling. The questionnaire measured five service dimensions: tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy on a seven-point likert scale. Pearson correlation and multiple regression analysis examined relationships between SERVPERF dimensions and customer satisfaction. Commission on Audit (COA) reports from six water districts were analyzed to assess alignment with NEDA Guidelines and integrated with survey data. Results reveal all five SERVPERF dimensions scored below moderate levels. Reliability received the lowest rating (M = 2.98), followed by Tangibles (M = 3.28) and Empathy (M = 3.32). Regression analysis showed all dimensions significantly predict satisfaction (R² = 0.861), with Empathy (? = 0.407) and Reliability (? = 0.288) as strongest predictors. COA findings revealed systemic violations: failure to submit mandatory reports, failure to install water service connection, water quality violations, high non-revenue water rate, unverifiable capital expenditures, and chronic operational deficiencies since 2019. Integration of survey and audit data demonstrates that operational failures directly correspond to poor customer perceptions. The findings indicate significant discrepancy between NEDA Guidelines and actual JVA implementation. Weak monitoring and inadequate enforcement allow poor performance to persist. Current JVA arrangements fail to improve water service delivery, with the most important dimensions to customers (Empathy and Reliability) being areas where private partners perform worst. Systemic reforms in enforcement of projects, clearer penalties and financial transparency are necessary to ensure these partnerships serve public welfare rather than private interests.

Iconic Research and Engineering JournalsVol. 9(6)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Public-Private Partnership Projects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.