Value of Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening: Integrating Real-World Adherence, Detection, and Prevention in a Cohort-Based Modeling Analysis

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Modeling analyses for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening focusing solely on the costs of screening do not fully capture the value of screening programs. We evaluated the clinical and economic effects of CRC stool-based screening tests, including impacts on cancer-related outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> A cohort-based decision-analytic cost-estimator model estimated outcomes for a single round of screening with next-generation multi-target stool DNA (ng mt-sDNA) test or fecal immunochemical test (FIT) from a US payer perspective. Undiagnosed cancers were assumed to become symptomatic (and detected) within 10 years. Clinical assumptions, advanced precancerous lesion and CRC prevalence, and test performance inputs were from clinical trial data. Adherence rates for initial screening and follow-up colonoscopy after a positive result were from real-world data. Input costs included the screening tests, follow-up colonoscopy (with and without polypectomy), and CRC treatment. <b>Results:</b> Compared with FIT, more individuals completed ng mt-sDNA (321,000 vs. 713,000, respectively), leading to the detection of more CRC cases (436 with FIT vs. 2235 with ng mt-sDNA), more advanced precancerous lesions, and more CRC at earlier stages. The cost of screening per patient screened was USD 801 for ng mt-sDNA and USD 124 for FIT. Follow-up colonoscopy cost was USD 149 million with ng mt-sDNA versus USD 22 million with FIT, whereas CRC treatment costs were lower for ng mt-sDNA (USD 1423 million versus USD 1474 million, respectively). When accounting for both direct and CRC averted costs, the total cost of screening and treatment was USD 1383 million with ng mt-sDNA versus USD 1427 million with FIT. <b>Conclusions:</b> Higher screening costs with ng mt-sDNA versus FIT are counterbalanced by savings realized from enhanced CRC prevention and earlier detection due to the superior test performance and better adherence with ng mt-sDNA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15010041
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.14

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Value of Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening: Integrating Real-World Adherence, Detection, and Prevention in a Cohort-Based Modeling Analysis

Chris Estes, Mohammad Amin Dehghani, Michael Dore, A. Mark Fendrick et al.
3 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
3.14
article

Value of Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening: Integrating Real-World Adherence, Detection, and Prevention in a Cohort-Based Modeling Analysis

Chris Estes, Mohammad Amin Dehghani, Michael Dore, A. Mark Fendrick, Derek W. Ebner, Gustavus Aranda
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Modeling analyses for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening focusing solely on the costs of screening do not fully capture the value of screening programs. We evaluated the clinical and economic effects of CRC stool-based screening tests, including impacts on cancer-related outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> A cohort-based decision-analytic cost-estimator model estimated outcomes for a single round of screening with next-generation multi-target stool DNA (ng mt-sDNA) test or fecal immunochemical test (FIT) from a US payer perspective. Undiagnosed cancers were assumed to become symptomatic (and detected) within 10 years. Clinical assumptions, advanced precancerous lesion and CRC prevalence, and test performance inputs were from clinical trial data. Adherence rates for initial screening and follow-up colonoscopy after a positive result were from real-world data. Input costs included the screening tests, follow-up colonoscopy (with and without polypectomy), and CRC treatment. <b>Results:</b> Compared with FIT, more individuals completed ng mt-sDNA (321,000 vs. 713,000, respectively), leading to the detection of more CRC cases (436 with FIT vs. 2235 with ng mt-sDNA), more advanced precancerous lesions, and more CRC at earlier stages. The cost of screening per patient screened was USD 801 for ng mt-sDNA and USD 124 for FIT. Follow-up colonoscopy cost was USD 149 million with ng mt-sDNA versus USD 22 million with FIT, whereas CRC treatment costs were lower for ng mt-sDNA (USD 1423 million versus USD 1474 million, respectively). When accounting for both direct and CRC averted costs, the total cost of screening and treatment was USD 1383 million with ng mt-sDNA versus USD 1427 million with FIT. <b>Conclusions:</b> Higher screening costs with ng mt-sDNA versus FIT are counterbalanced by savings realized from enhanced CRC prevention and earlier detection due to the superior test performance and better adherence with ng mt-sDNA.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(1)
Northeastern University (US), Duke University (US), University of Michigan (US), Exact Sciences (United States) (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
U.S. Department of Defense, National Pharmaceutical Council, Arnold Ventures, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
3.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.