Benchmarking and Analysis of Smart Battery Pack Architectures

The increasing penetration of renewable energy sources has intensified the demand for new topologies of battery energy storage systems. Smart batteries, which integrate a dedicated power converter in each module, provide flexibility, enhanced safety, and extended lifetime, but require more sophisticated battery management system strategies. This paper compares centralized and main-local BMS architectures applied to smart batteries, focusing on battery pack output voltage regulation, module coordination, and state-of-charge (SOC) balancing. Simulation and controller-hardware-in-the-loop experiments demonstrate that the centralized BMS delivers faster and synchronized operation, maintaining stable output voltage without overvoltage events. The main-local BMS, while more modular and scalable, exhibits voltage overshoots due to communication delays. Nevertheless, both approaches exhibited similar SOC equalization times, indicating that SOC dynamics are relatively insensitive to latency. These results highlight the trade-offs between dynamic performance, scalability, and safety, while also emphasizing the role of smart batteries in extending system lifetime. The findings provide guidelines for selecting the appropriate architecture according to system size and requirements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/sepoc67005.2025.11297614
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking and Analysis of Smart Battery Pack Architectures

P. G. S. Almeida, Remus Teodorescu, Ediward Amaral Carelli, Allan Fagner Cupertino et al.
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
article

Benchmarking and Analysis of Smart Battery Pack Architectures

P. G. S. Almeida, Remus Teodorescu, Ediward Amaral Carelli, Allan Fagner Cupertino, Heverton Augusto Pereira
article en

Abstract

The increasing penetration of renewable energy sources has intensified the demand for new topologies of battery energy storage systems. Smart batteries, which integrate a dedicated power converter in each module, provide flexibility, enhanced safety, and extended lifetime, but require more sophisticated battery management system strategies. This paper compares centralized and main-local BMS architectures applied to smart batteries, focusing on battery pack output voltage regulation, module coordination, and state-of-charge (SOC) balancing. Simulation and controller-hardware-in-the-loop experiments demonstrate that the centralized BMS delivers faster and synchronized operation, maintaining stable output voltage without overvoltage events. The main-local BMS, while more modular and scalable, exhibits voltage overshoots due to communication delays. Nevertheless, both approaches exhibited similar SOC equalization times, indicating that SOC dynamics are relatively insensitive to latency. These results highlight the trade-offs between dynamic performance, scalability, and safety, while also emphasizing the role of smart batteries in extending system lifetime. The findings provide guidelines for selecting the appropriate architecture according to system size and requirements.

Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (BR), Aalborg University (DK)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Benchmarking and Analysis of Smart Battery Pack Architectures — P. G. S. Almeida, Remus Teodorescu, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS