Stripping away rights: The impact of sexual entertainment venue licensing and feminist campaigns on dancers’ safety and livelihoods

This paper draws on a mixed-method Participatory Action Research project, co-produced by academics and strip club dancers, to deliver a post-pandemic analysis of the UK stripping industry more than a decade after the introduction of Sexual Entertainment Venue (SEV) licensing and the expansion of nil-cap bans. Our research makes three original contributions. First, we foreground disability and neurodivergence, largely overlooked in sex work scholarship, to show how strippers who are systematically excluded from mainstream labour markets cannot simply “find another job” when workplaces close, despite assumptions underpinning anti-strip club campaigns. Second, we expose the symbolic, political, and interpersonal violence generated by such campaigns, particularly from strands of radical feminist activism, revealing how they reproduce the very inequalities they claim to oppose. Third, we trace how market concentration and restrictive policy interact to erode workplace safety, fostering a culture of silence and displacing sex workers into more dangerous and criminalised environments, with disproportionate harm to the most marginalised. Centring dancer-led analysis, we conclude with harm-reduction oriented recommendations for regulation that prioritise labour rights, safety, and the self-determination of those most affected.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sexualities
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13634607251408673
Primary Topic
Sex work and related issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stripping away rights: The impact of sexual entertainment venue licensing and feminist campaigns on dancers’ safety and livelihoods

Jessica Simpson
Sexualities
Sex work and related issues
article

Stripping away rights: The impact of sexual entertainment venue licensing and feminist campaigns on dancers’ safety and livelihoods

Jessica Simpson
article en

Abstract

This paper draws on a mixed-method Participatory Action Research project, co-produced by academics and strip club dancers, to deliver a post-pandemic analysis of the UK stripping industry more than a decade after the introduction of Sexual Entertainment Venue (SEV) licensing and the expansion of nil-cap bans. Our research makes three original contributions. First, we foreground disability and neurodivergence, largely overlooked in sex work scholarship, to show how strippers who are systematically excluded from mainstream labour markets cannot simply “find another job” when workplaces close, despite assumptions underpinning anti-strip club campaigns. Second, we expose the symbolic, political, and interpersonal violence generated by such campaigns, particularly from strands of radical feminist activism, revealing how they reproduce the very inequalities they claim to oppose. Third, we trace how market concentration and restrictive policy interact to erode workplace safety, fostering a culture of silence and displacing sex workers into more dangerous and criminalised environments, with disproportionate harm to the most marginalised. Centring dancer-led analysis, we conclude with harm-reduction oriented recommendations for regulation that prioritise labour rights, safety, and the self-determination of those most affected.

Sexualities
University of Greenwich (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Sex work and related issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.