Change From Within: Building Support for Climate Policy in Groups Stereotypically Associated With Climate Opposition or Disengagement

ABSTRACT Despite broad support for climate policy across countries, some groups remain stereotypically associated with opposition to or disengagement from climate action. Examples include farmers and political conservatives. We interview 18 participants from six advocacy organisations trying to change their group's opposition to or disengagement from climate action and create norms of climate policy support. We introduce the term in‐group advocacy to describe their efforts to build support within their groups for a social cause. Participants employed three strategies to pursue change while keeping their groups cohesive: framing change as aligned with the group's true identity, arguing change is needed in these times and facilitating group interaction to calibrate the pace of change. We find managing intense criticism from group members required organising substantial social support for spokespeople. Four of the advocacy organisations engaged in identity leadership, trying to change their group's identity to achieve their objectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Social Psychology
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.70046
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Change From Within: Building Support for Climate Policy in Groups Stereotypically Associated With Climate Opposition or Disengagement

Kelly S. Fielding, Winnifred R. Louis, Samantha K. Stanley, Sarah Boddington et al.
European Journal of Social Psychology
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

Change From Within: Building Support for Climate Policy in Groups Stereotypically Associated With Climate Opposition or Disengagement

Kelly S. Fielding, Winnifred R. Louis, Samantha K. Stanley, Sarah Boddington, R. M. Colvin
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Despite broad support for climate policy across countries, some groups remain stereotypically associated with opposition to or disengagement from climate action. Examples include farmers and political conservatives. We interview 18 participants from six advocacy organisations trying to change their group's opposition to or disengagement from climate action and create norms of climate policy support. We introduce the term in‐group advocacy to describe their efforts to build support within their groups for a social cause. Participants employed three strategies to pursue change while keeping their groups cohesive: framing change as aligned with the group's true identity, arguing change is needed in these times and facilitating group interaction to calibrate the pace of change. We find managing intense criticism from group members required organising substantial social support for spokespeople. Four of the advocacy organisations engaged in identity leadership, trying to change their group's identity to achieve their objectives.

European Journal of Social PsychologyVol. 56(2)
Australian National University (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU)
Australian Government
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.