Assessment of Current Geotechnical Methods in Considering Ground Movement Effects on Structures

Usage & Licensing Notice: This work is provided for academic and informational purposes only. Any commercial, practical, industrial, or organizational use, including implementation or creation of derivative works, requires prior written permission and a separate licensing agreement with the author. Current geotechnical engineering practices often evaluate settlement and soil-related effects in isolation, relying on simplified assumptions. Broader ground movement mechanisms—such as those induced by groundwater level fluctuations, fault activity, and adjacent construction—are rarely assessed in an integrated manner. As a result, structural behavior, serviceability performance, and long-term reliability may not be fully predicted. These limitations reveal gaps in design methodologies, engineering software, and educational curricula. This work systematically documents these gaps, emphasizing the need for comprehensive assessment frameworks, further research, and improved consideration of ground movements in engineering practice and education.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18014795
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Current Geotechnical Methods in Considering Ground Movement Effects on Structures

Afshin kalantar Afshar
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
article

Assessment of Current Geotechnical Methods in Considering Ground Movement Effects on Structures

Afshin kalantar Afshar
article en

Abstract

Usage & Licensing Notice: This work is provided for academic and informational purposes only. Any commercial, practical, industrial, or organizational use, including implementation or creation of derivative works, requires prior written permission and a separate licensing agreement with the author. Current geotechnical engineering practices often evaluate settlement and soil-related effects in isolation, relying on simplified assumptions. Broader ground movement mechanisms—such as those induced by groundwater level fluctuations, fault activity, and adjacent construction—are rarely assessed in an integrated manner. As a result, structural behavior, serviceability performance, and long-term reliability may not be fully predicted. These limitations reveal gaps in design methodologies, engineering software, and educational curricula. This work systematically documents these gaps, emphasizing the need for comprehensive assessment frameworks, further research, and improved consideration of ground movements in engineering practice and education.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.