Retrospective Validation of Clinical Decision Support Tools for Predicting Effectiveness Outcomes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients Treated with Vedolizumab

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Two clinical decision support tools (CDSTs) have been developed to predict treatment effectiveness of vedolizumab in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). This study aimed to validate the CDSTs with real-world data from a Dutch teaching hospital. <b>Methods</b>: Patients with CD or UC treated with vedolizumab between October 2014 and July 2023 were included. IBD patients treated with ustekinumab were included to study the specificity of the CDSTs. The primary outcomes were rates of clinical remission (CREM), biochemical remission (BioREM), composite (either clinical or biochemical) remission (CompREM) and corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CSF-CREM) at week 14, 30 and 54. <b>Results</b>: 32 CD patients and 41 UC patients treated with vedolizumab were included, as well as 28 CD patients treated with ustekinumab and 41 UC patients treated with vedolizumab. Among UC patients treated with vedolizumab, rates of CREM, CompREM and CSF-CREM at week 54 were statistically significantly higher in the group with high probability of response compared to the group with low + intermediate probability of response (CREM 33.3% vs. 81.8% <i>p</i> = 0.003; CompREM 33.3% vs. 86.4% <i>p</i> < 0.001; CSF-CREM 22.2% vs. 77.3% <i>p</i> = 0.001). For both CD patients treated with vedolizumab and CD patients treated with ustekinumab, no statistically significant differences were found between low + intermediate and high probability groups for all outcomes. <b>Conclusions</b>: The CDST for UC is able to predict various effectiveness outcomes for treatment with vedolizumab and can therefore help in the selection of optimal treatment for patients with UC. For CD patients treated with vedolizumab, the CDST could not predict effectiveness outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmaceutics
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18010015
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Retrospective Validation of Clinical Decision Support Tools for Predicting Effectiveness Outcomes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients Treated with Vedolizumab

M Pierik, Luc J J Derijks, Paul de Klaver, Amber M. H. van Woerkens et al.
Pharmaceutics
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

Retrospective Validation of Clinical Decision Support Tools for Predicting Effectiveness Outcomes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients Treated with Vedolizumab

M Pierik, Luc J J Derijks, Paul de Klaver, Amber M. H. van Woerkens, Hedwig M. A. D’Agnolo
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Two clinical decision support tools (CDSTs) have been developed to predict treatment effectiveness of vedolizumab in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). This study aimed to validate the CDSTs with real-world data from a Dutch teaching hospital. <b>Methods</b>: Patients with CD or UC treated with vedolizumab between October 2014 and July 2023 were included. IBD patients treated with ustekinumab were included to study the specificity of the CDSTs. The primary outcomes were rates of clinical remission (CREM), biochemical remission (BioREM), composite (either clinical or biochemical) remission (CompREM) and corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CSF-CREM) at week 14, 30 and 54. <b>Results</b>: 32 CD patients and 41 UC patients treated with vedolizumab were included, as well as 28 CD patients treated with ustekinumab and 41 UC patients treated with vedolizumab. Among UC patients treated with vedolizumab, rates of CREM, CompREM and CSF-CREM at week 54 were statistically significantly higher in the group with high probability of response compared to the group with low + intermediate probability of response (CREM 33.3% vs. 81.8% <i>p</i> = 0.003; CompREM 33.3% vs. 86.4% <i>p</i> < 0.001; CSF-CREM 22.2% vs. 77.3% <i>p</i> = 0.001). For both CD patients treated with vedolizumab and CD patients treated with ustekinumab, no statistically significant differences were found between low + intermediate and high probability groups for all outcomes. <b>Conclusions</b>: The CDST for UC is able to predict various effectiveness outcomes for treatment with vedolizumab and can therefore help in the selection of optimal treatment for patients with UC. For CD patients treated with vedolizumab, the CDST could not predict effectiveness outcomes.

PharmaceuticsVol. 18(1)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Utrecht University (NL), Maastricht University (NL), Máxima Medisch Centrum (NL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.