Evaluation Starch-Based Hemostatic Agents “BioSight” as Adhesion Prevention Barrier Tested in an Adhesion Model in Rats

<b>Background:</b> Postoperative abdominal adhesions are a common and serious complication following abdominal surgery, often leading to chronic pain, bowel obstruction, or infertility. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the new starch-based absorbable hemostatic agent and dressing, BioSight, in comparison with a predicate device (4DryField<sup>®</sup> PH) for the prevention of abdominal adhesions in a rat model. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 90 Sprague-Dawley rats were used to establish an intra-abdominal adhesion model and assigned to the BioSight, 4DryField<sup>®</sup> PH, or control group. Standardized injuries were created on the cecum and parietal peritoneum, followed by application of the designated materials. Animals were sacrificed at 2, 4, and 12 weeks for macroscopic adhesion scoring and histopathological evaluation. Adhesion area, adhesion strength, and tissue thickness were assessed using established scoring systems, and local healing was examined by H&E staining. All quantitative data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. <b>Conclusions:</b> In a rat peritoneal adhesion model, BioSight exhibited pronounced anti-adhesion efficacy comparable to 4DryField<sup>®</sup> PH. Macroscopic evaluation showed consistently low adhesion scores (≤0.4) across all time points up to 12 weeks, while histological analysis confirmed reduced adhesion thickness, with BioSight displaying numerically lower values, particularly at early stages (251.3 ± 137.4 µm vs. 323.2 ± 174.6 µm at Week 2). This performance is attributed to rapid in situ hydrogel formation that provides effective temporary tissue separation, limits early fibrin deposition and inflammatory cell infiltration, and supports hemostasis. Importantly, the starch-based hydrogel exhibits a balanced biodegradation profile-persisting long enough to protect injured tissues during the critical inflammatory and fibroproliferative phases, yet undergoing complete enzymatic resorption thereafter without adverse tissue reactions. Collectively, these results highlight the anti-adhesion functionality of BioSight and support the clinical potential of plant-derived starch-based bioresorbable surgical adjuncts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymers
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18010033
Primary Topic
Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation Starch-Based Hemostatic Agents “BioSight” as Adhesion Prevention Barrier Tested in an Adhesion Model in Rats

Min-Hsuan Yen, Yixin Liu, Chih‐Yu Chen, C. W. Su et al.
Polymers
Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
article

Evaluation Starch-Based Hemostatic Agents “BioSight” as Adhesion Prevention Barrier Tested in an Adhesion Model in Rats

Min-Hsuan Yen, Yixin Liu, Chih‐Yu Chen, C. W. Su, Chih Hwa Chen, Hsu-Wei Fang
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Postoperative abdominal adhesions are a common and serious complication following abdominal surgery, often leading to chronic pain, bowel obstruction, or infertility. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the new starch-based absorbable hemostatic agent and dressing, BioSight, in comparison with a predicate device (4DryField<sup>®</sup> PH) for the prevention of abdominal adhesions in a rat model. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 90 Sprague-Dawley rats were used to establish an intra-abdominal adhesion model and assigned to the BioSight, 4DryField<sup>®</sup> PH, or control group. Standardized injuries were created on the cecum and parietal peritoneum, followed by application of the designated materials. Animals were sacrificed at 2, 4, and 12 weeks for macroscopic adhesion scoring and histopathological evaluation. Adhesion area, adhesion strength, and tissue thickness were assessed using established scoring systems, and local healing was examined by H&E staining. All quantitative data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. <b>Conclusions:</b> In a rat peritoneal adhesion model, BioSight exhibited pronounced anti-adhesion efficacy comparable to 4DryField<sup>®</sup> PH. Macroscopic evaluation showed consistently low adhesion scores (≤0.4) across all time points up to 12 weeks, while histological analysis confirmed reduced adhesion thickness, with BioSight displaying numerically lower values, particularly at early stages (251.3 ± 137.4 µm vs. 323.2 ± 174.6 µm at Week 2). This performance is attributed to rapid in situ hydrogel formation that provides effective temporary tissue separation, limits early fibrin deposition and inflammatory cell infiltration, and supports hemostasis. Importantly, the starch-based hydrogel exhibits a balanced biodegradation profile-persisting long enough to protect injured tissues during the critical inflammatory and fibroproliferative phases, yet undergoing complete enzymatic resorption thereafter without adverse tissue reactions. Collectively, these results highlight the anti-adhesion functionality of BioSight and support the clinical potential of plant-derived starch-based bioresorbable surgical adjuncts.

PolymersVol. 18(1)
National Taipei University of Technology (TW), National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW), National Health Research Institutes (TW), Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital (TW), Taipei Medical University (TW)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.