Cadaveric Evaluation of MIS Akin Variation on Length and Angular Correction

Research Type: Level 4 – Case series Introduction/Purpose: Hallux abductovalgus, commonly known as a bunion, is a prevalent deformity of the forefoot with many described techniques for surgical correction. Minimally invasive surgery is gaining popularity in the foot and ankle community, but there is limited literature on the degree of correction achievable with akin osteotomies using these techniques. This study aims to compare the outcomes of oblique and transverse Akin osteotomies using two different burr sizes (2.0mm and 2.9mm) on cadaveric specimens to evaluate the effects of angular correction and bone length. Methods: Ten matched pairs (20 total) of thawed fresh-frozen cadaveric above-knee specimens were used. Each specimen had demographic data recorded, and pre-test dorsal-plantar X-ray images of the hallux proximal phalanx. The medial soft tissues were dissected, and proximal and distal points were measured with calipers. Five matched pairs received oblique osteotomies, and five received transverse osteotomies; left feet used a 2.0mm burr, right used a 2.9mm burr. A single MIS experienced surgeon performed all procedures. Post-test imaging, taken in the same orientation with the osteotomies in manually reduced positions. Caliper measurements were repeated, and images were analyzed with a Dicom viewer. Angular correction was determined by comparing pre- and post-test longitudinal axes. Results: For oblique osteotomies on cadavers 1–5 (left with 2.0 mm burr, right with 2.9 mm burr), post-test length differences measured 0.26 cm versus 0.45 cm. The average osteotomy angles were 57.78° and 58.26°, while degrees of correction averaged 4.43° (SD 1.66) and 9.40° (SD 5.62). For transverse osteotomies on cadavers 6–10, the 2.0 mm burr (left) produced a 0.34 cm length difference, an 85.43° angle, and 6.64° of correction (SD 4.38). The 2.9 mm burr (right) yielded a 0.52 cm difference, an 89.97° angle, and 14.87° of correction (SD 4.10). Conclusion: These findings suggest that burr size affects surgical correction in a predictable pattern, with the 2.9mm burr and transverse osteotomies providing greater change compared to the 2.0mm burr and oblique osteotomy. This study highlights the importance of preoperative planning and burr selection in achieving optimal and consistent results for patients undergoing minimally invasive Akin osteotomy procedures.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011425s00159
Primary Topic
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cadaveric Evaluation of MIS Akin Variation on Length and Angular Correction

Roberto A. Brandão, Steven Cooperman, Jae Yoon Kim, Orlando Martinez
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Foot and Ankle Surgery
article

Cadaveric Evaluation of MIS Akin Variation on Length and Angular Correction

Roberto A. Brandão, Steven Cooperman, Jae Yoon Kim, Orlando Martinez
article en

Abstract

Research Type: Level 4 – Case series Introduction/Purpose: Hallux abductovalgus, commonly known as a bunion, is a prevalent deformity of the forefoot with many described techniques for surgical correction. Minimally invasive surgery is gaining popularity in the foot and ankle community, but there is limited literature on the degree of correction achievable with akin osteotomies using these techniques. This study aims to compare the outcomes of oblique and transverse Akin osteotomies using two different burr sizes (2.0mm and 2.9mm) on cadaveric specimens to evaluate the effects of angular correction and bone length. Methods: Ten matched pairs (20 total) of thawed fresh-frozen cadaveric above-knee specimens were used. Each specimen had demographic data recorded, and pre-test dorsal-plantar X-ray images of the hallux proximal phalanx. The medial soft tissues were dissected, and proximal and distal points were measured with calipers. Five matched pairs received oblique osteotomies, and five received transverse osteotomies; left feet used a 2.0mm burr, right used a 2.9mm burr. A single MIS experienced surgeon performed all procedures. Post-test imaging, taken in the same orientation with the osteotomies in manually reduced positions. Caliper measurements were repeated, and images were analyzed with a Dicom viewer. Angular correction was determined by comparing pre- and post-test longitudinal axes. Results: For oblique osteotomies on cadavers 1–5 (left with 2.0 mm burr, right with 2.9 mm burr), post-test length differences measured 0.26 cm versus 0.45 cm. The average osteotomy angles were 57.78° and 58.26°, while degrees of correction averaged 4.43° (SD 1.66) and 9.40° (SD 5.62). For transverse osteotomies on cadavers 6–10, the 2.0 mm burr (left) produced a 0.34 cm length difference, an 85.43° angle, and 6.64° of correction (SD 4.38). The 2.9 mm burr (right) yielded a 0.52 cm difference, an 89.97° angle, and 14.87° of correction (SD 4.10). Conclusion: These findings suggest that burr size affects surgical correction in a predictable pattern, with the 2.9mm burr and transverse osteotomies providing greater change compared to the 2.0mm burr and oblique osteotomy. This study highlights the importance of preoperative planning and burr selection in achieving optimal and consistent results for patients undergoing minimally invasive Akin osteotomy procedures.

Foot & Ankle OrthopaedicsVol. 10(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Foot and Ankle Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cadaveric Evaluation of MIS Akin Variation on Length and Angular Correction — Roberto A. Brandão, Steven Cooperman, et al. · Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS