Conserving Freshwater Biodiversity in U. S. Protected Areas – Management Intervention and the RAD Framework

Protected areas are considered a critical antidote to global biodiversity loss. Yet, protected areas have not effectively preserved freshwater biodiversity compared to other taxonomic groups, in part because they are not designed or managed with freshwater ecosystems in mind. Additionally, historical and current human activities have degraded freshwater biodiversity, and climate driven transformation constrains the ability of protected areas to preserve freshwater biodiversity into the future. Management intervention is an important tool to ensure protected areas support current and future ecological, socio-cultural, and economic values surrounding freshwater biodiversity. Yet applying interventions is challenging because many protected areas limit human manipulation and control. The Resist-Accept-Direct (RAD) framework is a tool for weighing management approaches in an expanded decision space. As such, the RAD framework may help identify the most appropriate approaches to address ecological transformation while balancing the mandates and values of a given protected area. In this paper, we review federally protected areas of the United States and their varied ability to support freshwater biodiversity. We then recast past management approaches through a RAD lens, examining how they resist, accept, or direct freshwater biodiversity loss in these protected areas. This illustrates how elements of the RAD framework are already being applied and provides a foundation for managers to more formally resist, accept, or direct freshwater biodiversity loss in protected areas moving forward. We conclude with considerations for applying the RAD framework at the intersection of freshwater biodiversity and protected areas to benefit values of current and future generations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Management
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02304-0
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conserving Freshwater Biodiversity in U. S. Protected Areas – Management Intervention and the RAD Framework

Andrea E. A. Stephens, Kellie J. Carim, Lisa A. Eby, Remi Murdoch et al.
1 citations
Environmental Management
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
2.31
article

Conserving Freshwater Biodiversity in U. S. Protected Areas – Management Intervention and the RAD Framework

Andrea E. A. Stephens, Kellie J. Carim, Lisa A. Eby, Remi Murdoch, Hannah M Adkins, Matthew Webster, Kira Hefty, Leah Simantel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Protected areas are considered a critical antidote to global biodiversity loss. Yet, protected areas have not effectively preserved freshwater biodiversity compared to other taxonomic groups, in part because they are not designed or managed with freshwater ecosystems in mind. Additionally, historical and current human activities have degraded freshwater biodiversity, and climate driven transformation constrains the ability of protected areas to preserve freshwater biodiversity into the future. Management intervention is an important tool to ensure protected areas support current and future ecological, socio-cultural, and economic values surrounding freshwater biodiversity. Yet applying interventions is challenging because many protected areas limit human manipulation and control. The Resist-Accept-Direct (RAD) framework is a tool for weighing management approaches in an expanded decision space. As such, the RAD framework may help identify the most appropriate approaches to address ecological transformation while balancing the mandates and values of a given protected area. In this paper, we review federally protected areas of the United States and their varied ability to support freshwater biodiversity. We then recast past management approaches through a RAD lens, examining how they resist, accept, or direct freshwater biodiversity loss in these protected areas. This illustrates how elements of the RAD framework are already being applied and provides a foundation for managers to more formally resist, accept, or direct freshwater biodiversity loss in protected areas moving forward. We conclude with considerations for applying the RAD framework at the intersection of freshwater biodiversity and protected areas to benefit values of current and future generations.

Environmental ManagementVol. 76(2)
Rocky Mountain Research (United States) (US), University of Montana (US)
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, George Washington University, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Forest Service, National Park Service
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.