The benefits of exploring a large scenario space for future energy systems

Energy scenario analysis with optimization approaches rarely goes beyond a small number of scenarios. Disadvantages include limited coverage of uncertainties and assumptions, and a limited ability to provide robust policy advice. We present an approach that enables the multi-criterial evaluation of more than 11,000 scenarios and demonstrate it for the German power system. We vary both a wide range of input parameters and method choices. The resulting scenarios are assessed through a number of indicators on affordability, supply-security and sustainability. The most significant impacts on the results stem from considering multiple weather years. Furthermore, we estimate the number of runs required for robust energy systems analyses - well over 100 scenarios are needed. Nevertheless, fewer scenarios may be sufficient for limited scopes. Our analysis also underlines a challenge for future energy system design: cost-efficient decarbonization while conserving natural resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-67593-9
Primary Topic
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The benefits of exploring a large scenario space for future energy systems

Shima Sasanpour, Thomas Breuer, Jan Buschmann, Karl-Kiên Cao et al.
Nature Communications
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
article

The benefits of exploring a large scenario space for future energy systems

Shima Sasanpour, Thomas Breuer, Jan Buschmann, Karl-Kiên Cao, Ulrich Joachim Frey
article en

Abstract

Energy scenario analysis with optimization approaches rarely goes beyond a small number of scenarios. Disadvantages include limited coverage of uncertainties and assumptions, and a limited ability to provide robust policy advice. We present an approach that enables the multi-criterial evaluation of more than 11,000 scenarios and demonstrate it for the German power system. We vary both a wide range of input parameters and method choices. The resulting scenarios are assessed through a number of indicators on affordability, supply-security and sustainability. The most significant impacts on the results stem from considering multiple weather years. Furthermore, we estimate the number of runs required for robust energy systems analyses - well over 100 scenarios are needed. Nevertheless, fewer scenarios may be sufficient for limited scopes. Our analysis also underlines a challenge for future energy system design: cost-efficient decarbonization while conserving natural resources.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 17(1)
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE), University of Graz (AT), Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie, Gauss Centre for Supercomputing
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.