Watt's the difference? A randomised trial of high‐ vs low‐power ureteroscopic thulium fibre laser lithotripsy

Using HP did not shorten the operative time. LP improved SFRs for Grade A/B and reduced minor postoperative morbidity, supporting LP as the default TFL strategy for sheathless URS lithotripsy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Urology
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.70123
Primary Topic
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Watt's the difference? A randomised trial of high‐ vs low‐power ureteroscopic thulium fibre laser lithotripsy

Patrick Juliebø‐Jones, C. Beisland, Peder Gjengstø, Øyvind Ulvik et al.
British Journal of Urology
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
article

Watt's the difference? A randomised trial of high‐ vs low‐power ureteroscopic thulium fibre laser lithotripsy

Patrick Juliebø‐Jones, C. Beisland, Peder Gjengstø, Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy
article en

Abstract

Using HP did not shorten the operative time. LP improved SFRs for Grade A/B and reduced minor postoperative morbidity, supporting LP as the default TFL strategy for sheathless URS lithotripsy.

British Journal of UrologyVol. 137(3)
Haukeland University Hospital (NO), University of Bergen (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.