Ultrasound-Guided Femoral Hemostasis in Peripheral Angioplasty: Real-World Outcomes with Vascular Closure Devices Versus Manual Compression
<i>Background and Objectives:</i> Access-site complications (ASCs) remain clinically relevant after peripheral endovascular procedures, particularly with large femoral sheaths and complex anatomy. While randomized coronary trials show non-inferiority of vascular closure devices (VCDs) versus manual compression (MC), real-world data in peripheral interventions performed under systematic ultrasound-guided access are limited. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: This retrospective single-center cohort included consecutive peripheral arterial revascularizations (2010-2023) performed via common femoral access under real-time ultrasound guidance. Hemostasis was achieved using MC or VCDs, categorized as collagen plug-based, suture-mediated, or clip-based systems. The primary endpoint was 30-day ASCs, defined as hematoma requiring management, pseudoaneurysm, bleeding requiring transfusion, access-site thrombosis/occlusion, arteriovenous fistula, or infection. The secondary endpoint was VCD failure, defined as unsuccessful hemostasis requiring adjunctive measures. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for prespecified anatomical and procedural covariates, including sheath size > 6 Fr and puncture-site calcification. <i>Results</i>: Among 231 procedures, VCDs were used in 139 (60.2%) and MC in 92 (39.8%). ASC occurred in 28 cases (12.1%), with higher rates in the MC group compared with VCDs (18.5% vs. 9-14% across device types; <i>p</i> = 0.044). In adjusted analyses, MC (vs any VCD) (odds ratio [OR] 2.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-5.47; <i>p</i> = 0.035), sheath size > 6 Fr, and puncture-site calcification were independently associated with ASCs. VCD failure occurred in 5 cases (3.6%) and was not observed with collagen plug-based devices. <i>Conclusions</i>: In this ultrasound-guided real-world peripheral cohort, VCD use was associated with lower 30-day ASC rates and low device failure rates compared with MC. Given the retrospective and non-randomized design, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and support individualized, imaging-guided strategies for femoral closure in peripheral interventions.
Authors
- Ioannis Skalidis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4374-0389)
- Benjamin Honton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3715-0160)
- Youcef Lounes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9502-2808)
- Nicolas Amabile (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9092-4458)
- Antoinette Neylon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3873-1652)
- Stéphane Champagne (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7431-6305)
- Thierry Unterseeh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4810-3159)
- Livio D’Angelo
- Antoine Sauguet
- F. Sanguineti
- Neila Sayah (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0473-9623)
- Mariama Akodad (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2957-5655)
- H. Benamer
- Philippe Garot (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5069-4149)
- Pietro Laforgia
- Thomas Hovasse
Institutions
- Fribourg Development Agency (CH)
- Clinique Pasteur (FR)
- Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud (FR)
- Hôpital Privé Jacques Cartier (FR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Medicina
- Published
- 2025-12-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62010028
- Primary Topic
- Vascular Procedures and Complications
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00