Digital tools in urban forestry

Digital tools are used widely to plan and manage urban forests for sustainability. We conducted a scoping review to investigate how researchers use and envision integrating digital tools into urban forestry. Employing content analysis, we identified and analyzed which urban forest variables are studied, how decision-making is understood, and who this research empowers. Findings indicate that researchers predominantly use remote sensing tools to inventory and assess urban forests; tools are less often used in strategizing, monitoring, or planning for future scenarios. Researchers recognize municipal governments as loci of urban forestry decision-making, yet fail to identify entities capable of implementing findings. References to inclusive and participatory governance are infrequent. We find that reliance on a limited set of digital tools predetermines which aspects of urban forests are valued and whose perspectives are privileged. Additional emphasis on digital tools activating participation in urban forestry is needed to enhance urban forest sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Urban Sustainability
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-025-00324-7
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital tools in urban forestry

Alexandra G. Ponette‐González, Ashley R. Coles, Matthew Fry, B. L. WILLIAMSON et al.
npj Urban Sustainability
Urban Green Space and Health
article

Digital tools in urban forestry

Alexandra G. Ponette‐González, Ashley R. Coles, Matthew Fry, B. L. WILLIAMSON, Kaylee P. Alexander, Rylee Babino
article en

Abstract

Digital tools are used widely to plan and manage urban forests for sustainability. We conducted a scoping review to investigate how researchers use and envision integrating digital tools into urban forestry. Employing content analysis, we identified and analyzed which urban forest variables are studied, how decision-making is understood, and who this research empowers. Findings indicate that researchers predominantly use remote sensing tools to inventory and assess urban forests; tools are less often used in strategizing, monitoring, or planning for future scenarios. Researchers recognize municipal governments as loci of urban forestry decision-making, yet fail to identify entities capable of implementing findings. References to inclusive and participatory governance are infrequent. We find that reliance on a limited set of digital tools predetermines which aspects of urban forests are valued and whose perspectives are privileged. Additional emphasis on digital tools activating participation in urban forestry is needed to enhance urban forest sustainability.

npj Urban SustainabilityVol. 6(1)
Texas Christian University (US), University of Utah (US), Natural History Museum of Utah (US), City University of Seattle (US)
National Science Foundation
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.