High-resolution binding data of TFIID and cofactors show promoter-specific differences <i>in vivo</i>

TFIID is instrumental in recognizing promoter sequences and initiating transcription, yet a cohesive understanding of how this complex interacts with and functions at different promoter types <i>in vivo</i> is still lacking. Here, we employed ChIP-nexus to capture high-resolution binding footprints of all <i>Drosophila</i> TFIID subunits across the genome. These footprints reveal TFIID sub-modules whose DNA contacts suggest new structural details. At different promoter types, the footprints of the TAFs are very similar, suggesting the presence of engaged TFIID across all promoters. In contrast, the binding profile of TBP is promoter-specific, enabling us to identify TATA, DPR, and TCT/housekeeping promoters <i>de novo</i>, along with their underlying core promoter elements. Notably, our data point to NC2 being specific for TBP binding at the TATA box and suggest that TATA promoters show both TAF-dependent and TAF-independent initiation <i>in vivo</i>. These data suggest a model for the increased burst size observed at TATA promoters and provide a comprehensive resource for linking structural and biochemical results to <i>in vivo</i> data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2025.12.22.691305
Primary Topic
Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High-resolution binding data of TFIID and cofactors show promoter-specific differences in vivo

Julia Zeitlinger, Melanie Weilert, Sergio G-M Alcantara, Simon Bourdareau
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
article

High-resolution binding data of TFIID and cofactors show promoter-specific differences in vivo

Julia Zeitlinger, Melanie Weilert, Sergio G-M Alcantara, Simon Bourdareau
article en

Abstract

TFIID is instrumental in recognizing promoter sequences and initiating transcription, yet a cohesive understanding of how this complex interacts with and functions at different promoter types <i>in vivo</i> is still lacking. Here, we employed ChIP-nexus to capture high-resolution binding footprints of all <i>Drosophila</i> TFIID subunits across the genome. These footprints reveal TFIID sub-modules whose DNA contacts suggest new structural details. At different promoter types, the footprints of the TAFs are very similar, suggesting the presence of engaged TFIID across all promoters. In contrast, the binding profile of TBP is promoter-specific, enabling us to identify TATA, DPR, and TCT/housekeeping promoters <i>de novo</i>, along with their underlying core promoter elements. Notably, our data point to NC2 being specific for TBP binding at the TATA box and suggest that TATA promoters show both TAF-dependent and TAF-independent initiation <i>in vivo</i>. These data suggest a model for the increased burst size observed at TATA promoters and provide a comprehensive resource for linking structural and biochemical results to <i>in vivo</i> data.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Stowers Institute for Medical Research (US), University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
Stowers Institute for Medical Research, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.