The adaptive tasks and trade-offs that drive the human value system

Human values inform behaviors, attitudes, and beliefs, but what shapes the human value system? Here, we employ Pareto analysis on the European Social Survey data (N = 411,904). Pareto analysis relies on an optimization framework to extract the drivers that shape people's individual variations. We found that individual differences in values are linked to balancing trade-offs between three adaptive tasks: Self-enhancement, Growth, and Conservation. Notably, value combinations that represent non-adaptive trade-off solutions, though considered theoretically possible, are absent from the data. These adaptive tasks are robust across two global samples, multiple countries, different religiosity levels, and age groups. Beyond identifying adaptive tasks, Pareto analysis provided a framework for assessing trade-off shifts across development and religiosity levels. This work paves the way for investigating the tasks' etiology and their underlying mechanisms. More broadly, Pareto analysis offers a principled approach to understanding individual differences in humans, revealing the adaptive tasks and trade-offs that drive complex psychological systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Psychology
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-025-00382-8
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The adaptive tasks and trade-offs that drive the human value system

Noam Markovitch, Ariel Knafo-Noam, Dan Hilman Amir, Rony Zer Kavod et al.
Communications Psychology
Cultural Differences and Values
article

The adaptive tasks and trade-offs that drive the human value system

Noam Markovitch, Ariel Knafo-Noam, Dan Hilman Amir, Rony Zer Kavod, Yuval Hart
article en

Abstract

Human values inform behaviors, attitudes, and beliefs, but what shapes the human value system? Here, we employ Pareto analysis on the European Social Survey data (N = 411,904). Pareto analysis relies on an optimization framework to extract the drivers that shape people's individual variations. We found that individual differences in values are linked to balancing trade-offs between three adaptive tasks: Self-enhancement, Growth, and Conservation. Notably, value combinations that represent non-adaptive trade-off solutions, though considered theoretically possible, are absent from the data. These adaptive tasks are robust across two global samples, multiple countries, different religiosity levels, and age groups. Beyond identifying adaptive tasks, Pareto analysis provided a framework for assessing trade-off shifts across development and religiosity levels. This work paves the way for investigating the tasks' etiology and their underlying mechanisms. More broadly, Pareto analysis offers a principled approach to understanding individual differences in humans, revealing the adaptive tasks and trade-offs that drive complex psychological systems.

Communications PsychologyVol. 4(1)
Illinois College (US), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL), University College London (GB)
Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Haruv Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Cultural Differences and Values
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.