New Tools, Old Biases: The Harm and Potential of Virtual Reality Technology and Policy Recommendations for Black Women

This paper critically examines the ethical concerns and harms associated with virtual reality (VR) technology, emphasizing their disproportionate impact on Black women and members of other multiply marginalized social groups. While VR offers significant potential across sectors, its development and deployment often perpetuate longstanding biases, resulting in privacy risks, lack of accountability, and cultural erasure. Key VR harms are enumerated—such as limited representation, intensified surveillance, and inadequate recourse for harassment—which are often amplified for individuals at the intersection of multiple marginalized identities. This paper highlights how current VR policy approaches often overlook these compounded vulnerabilities. To address these gaps, the authors propose intersectional VR policy recommendations: enhancing user autonomy and accountability through rolling consent and robust reporting mechanisms; advancing intersectional representation via early education, inclusive recruitment, and community-based participatory research; and leveraging the lived expertise of Black women and members of other multiply marginalized groups to unlock VR's liberatory potential. These intersectional strategies are essential for equitable and socially transformative VR policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23727322251406555
Primary Topic
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New Tools, Old Biases: The Harm and Potential of Virtual Reality Technology and Policy Recommendations for Black Women

Chelsea A. Allen, Valerie Jones Taylor, Tuğba Metinyurt
Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
article

New Tools, Old Biases: The Harm and Potential of Virtual Reality Technology and Policy Recommendations for Black Women

Chelsea A. Allen, Valerie Jones Taylor, Tuğba Metinyurt
article en

Abstract

This paper critically examines the ethical concerns and harms associated with virtual reality (VR) technology, emphasizing their disproportionate impact on Black women and members of other multiply marginalized social groups. While VR offers significant potential across sectors, its development and deployment often perpetuate longstanding biases, resulting in privacy risks, lack of accountability, and cultural erasure. Key VR harms are enumerated—such as limited representation, intensified surveillance, and inadequate recourse for harassment—which are often amplified for individuals at the intersection of multiple marginalized identities. This paper highlights how current VR policy approaches often overlook these compounded vulnerabilities. To address these gaps, the authors propose intersectional VR policy recommendations: enhancing user autonomy and accountability through rolling consent and robust reporting mechanisms; advancing intersectional representation via early education, inclusive recruitment, and community-based participatory research; and leveraging the lived expertise of Black women and members of other multiply marginalized groups to unlock VR's liberatory potential. These intersectional strategies are essential for equitable and socially transformative VR policy.

Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain SciencesVol. 13(1)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (NL), Rütgers (Germany) (DE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.