Evaluation of D-dimer Level in Relation to Other Prognostic Factors in Multiple Myeloma Patients

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematologic malignancy associated with a hypercoagulable state, leading to increased thrombotic risk. The IMPEDE-VTE score is a validated tool for assessing thrombotic risk in MM patients, while D-dimer is a well-established biomarker of fibrinolytic activity. This study aims to investigate the correlation between IMPEDE score and D-dimer levels and their prognostic implications in MM patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted on 80 MM patients, divided into newly diagnosed (Group 1, n = 35) and established cases on treatment (Group 2, n = 45) as both compared to healthy control group ( n = 36). Patients were stratified based on IMPEDE-VTE scores into high-risk (≥4 points) and low-risk (<3 points) groups. D-dimer levels were measured and analyzed in relation to IMPEDE score, disease characteristics, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: IMPEDE-VTE score was significantly associated with D-dimer levels ( P = 0.017 in Group 1, P = 0.0075 in Group 2). Mean D-dimer levels were 1619.74 ng/ml in Group 1 versus 830.09 ng/ml in Group 2 ( P < 0.001). Higher IMPEDE scores correlated with elevated D-dimer levels, indicating a higher thrombotic risk. D-dimer reduction posttreatment correlated with improved response, suggesting its potential role as a marker of disease activity. CONCLUSION: D-dimer levels strongly correlate with IMPEDE-VTE score in MM patients and may serve as an additional prognostic tool to predict thrombotic risk and treatment response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Hematology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/joah.joah_93_25
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of D-dimer Level in Relation to Other Prognostic Factors in Multiple Myeloma Patients

Waseem F. Al-Tameemi, Alhan A. Alkhalidi
Journal of Applied Hematology
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
article

Evaluation of D-dimer Level in Relation to Other Prognostic Factors in Multiple Myeloma Patients

Waseem F. Al-Tameemi, Alhan A. Alkhalidi
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematologic malignancy associated with a hypercoagulable state, leading to increased thrombotic risk. The IMPEDE-VTE score is a validated tool for assessing thrombotic risk in MM patients, while D-dimer is a well-established biomarker of fibrinolytic activity. This study aims to investigate the correlation between IMPEDE score and D-dimer levels and their prognostic implications in MM patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted on 80 MM patients, divided into newly diagnosed (Group 1, n = 35) and established cases on treatment (Group 2, n = 45) as both compared to healthy control group ( n = 36). Patients were stratified based on IMPEDE-VTE scores into high-risk (≥4 points) and low-risk (<3 points) groups. D-dimer levels were measured and analyzed in relation to IMPEDE score, disease characteristics, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: IMPEDE-VTE score was significantly associated with D-dimer levels ( P = 0.017 in Group 1, P = 0.0075 in Group 2). Mean D-dimer levels were 1619.74 ng/ml in Group 1 versus 830.09 ng/ml in Group 2 ( P < 0.001). Higher IMPEDE scores correlated with elevated D-dimer levels, indicating a higher thrombotic risk. D-dimer reduction posttreatment correlated with improved response, suggesting its potential role as a marker of disease activity. CONCLUSION: D-dimer levels strongly correlate with IMPEDE-VTE score in MM patients and may serve as an additional prognostic tool to predict thrombotic risk and treatment response.

Journal of Applied HematologyVol. 16(4)
University of Alkafeel (IQ), Nahrain University (IQ)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.