The Impact of Generative AI Tools on Academic Performance in Higher Education: A Systematic Review (2023–2025)

This paper examines how generative AI tools—such as ChatGPT, GitHub Copilot, and related large language models—are influencing academic performance in higher education. We reviewed empirical studies published between 2023 and 2025 and followed PRISMA guidelines to search major open-access databases, including ERIC, DOAJ, arXiv, MDPI, and Semantic Scholar. Our review focused on research that reported measurable outcomes such as GPA, exam scores, writing quality, and coding accuracy. In total, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria, representing a range of countries, disciplines, and instructional contexts. The results are far from uniform. Several studies reported gains in writing, coding, and task efficiency when generative AI was used in a structured and purposeful way. Others, however, found little improvement or even lower performance when students relied heavily on AI without guidance. Taken together, the evidence shows that AI’s impact on learning is highly varied and strongly dependent on context. This underscores the need for deliberate integration and for more sustained, data-driven research as these tools continue to evolve.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v15-i12/27076
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Generative AI Tools on Academic Performance in Higher Education: A Systematic Review (2023–2025)

Safiah Md Yusof, Raziana Che Aziz, P. Rajesh Kumar, Alias Mahmud
International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

The Impact of Generative AI Tools on Academic Performance in Higher Education: A Systematic Review (2023–2025)

Safiah Md Yusof, Raziana Che Aziz, P. Rajesh Kumar, Alias Mahmud
article en

Abstract

This paper examines how generative AI tools—such as ChatGPT, GitHub Copilot, and related large language models—are influencing academic performance in higher education. We reviewed empirical studies published between 2023 and 2025 and followed PRISMA guidelines to search major open-access databases, including ERIC, DOAJ, arXiv, MDPI, and Semantic Scholar. Our review focused on research that reported measurable outcomes such as GPA, exam scores, writing quality, and coding accuracy. In total, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria, representing a range of countries, disciplines, and instructional contexts. The results are far from uniform. Several studies reported gains in writing, coding, and task efficiency when generative AI was used in a structured and purposeful way. Others, however, found little improvement or even lower performance when students relied heavily on AI without guidance. Taken together, the evidence shows that AI’s impact on learning is highly varied and strongly dependent on context. This underscores the need for deliberate integration and for more sustained, data-driven research as these tools continue to evolve.

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social SciencesVol. 15(12)
Computer Emergency Response Team (FR), Open University Malaysia (MY), National University of Malaysia (MY), Saft (France) (FR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.