Approximation Algorithms for the Weighted Nash Social Welfare via Convex and Non-Convex Programs

Abstract In an instance of the weighted Nash Social Welfare problem, we are given a set of m indivisible items, $$\mathcal {G}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> </mml:math> , and n agents, $$\mathcal {A}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>A</mml:mi> </mml:math> , where each agent $$i \in \mathcal {A}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>i</mml:mi> <mml:mo>∈</mml:mo> <mml:mi>A</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> has a valuation $$v_{ij}\ge 0$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>v</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ij</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>≥</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for each item $$j\in \mathcal {G}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>j</mml:mi> <mml:mo>∈</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . In addition, every agent i has a non-negative weight $$w_i$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>w</mml:mi> <mml:mi>i</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> such that the weights collectively sum up to 1. The goal is to find an assignment $$\sigma :\mathcal {G}\rightarrow \mathcal {A}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>σ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>:</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>→</mml:mo> <mml:mi>A</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> that maximizes $$\prod _{i\in \mathcal {A}} \left( \sum _{j\in \sigma ^{-1}(i)} v_{ij}\right) ^{w_i}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mo>∏</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>i</mml:mi> <mml:mo>∈</mml:mo> <mml:mi>A</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:msup> <mml:mfenced> <mml:msub> <mml:mo>∑</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>j</mml:mi> <mml:mo>∈</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>σ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>i</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>v</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ij</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mfenced> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>w</mml:mi> <mml:mi>i</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , the product of the weighted valuations of the players. When all the weights equal $$\frac{1}{n}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mfrac> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> </mml:mfrac> </mml:math> , the problem reduces to the classical Nash Social Welfare problem, which has recently received much attention. In this work, we present a $$5\cdot \exp \left( 2\cdot D_{\textrm{KL}}(\textbf{w}\, ||\, \frac{\vec {\textbf{1}}}{n})\right) = 5\cdot \exp \left( 2\log {n} + 2\sum _{i=1}^n w_i \log {w_i}\right) $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> <mml:mo>·</mml:mo> <mml:mo>exp</mml:mo> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mo>·</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>D</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>KL</mml:mtext> </mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>w</mml:mi> <mml:mspace/> <mml:mo>|</mml:mo> <mml:mo>|</mml:mo> <mml:mspace/> </mml:mrow> <mml:mfrac> <mml:mover> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>→</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> </mml:mfrac> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mfenced> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> <mml:mo>·</mml:mo> <mml:mo>exp</mml:mo>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematical Programming
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-025-02300-6
Primary Topic
Optimization and Variational Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Approximation Algorithms for the Weighted Nash Social Welfare via Convex and Non-Convex Programs

Adam J. Brown, Aditi Laddha, Madhusudhan Reddy Pittu, Mohit Singh
Mathematical Programming
Optimization and Variational Analysis
article

Approximation Algorithms for the Weighted Nash Social Welfare via Convex and Non-Convex Programs

Adam J. Brown, Aditi Laddha, Madhusudhan Reddy Pittu, Mohit Singh
article en

Abstract

Abstract In an instance of the weighted Nash Social Welfare problem, we are given a set of m indivisible items, $$\mathcal {G}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> </mml:math> , and n agents, $$\mathcal {A}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>A</mml:mi> </mml:math> , where each agent $$i \in \mathcal {A}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>i</mml:mi> <mml:mo>∈</mml:mo> <mml:mi>A</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> has a valuation $$v_{ij}\ge 0$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>v</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ij</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>≥</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for each item $$j\in \mathcal {G}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>j</mml:mi> <mml:mo>∈</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . In addition, every agent i has a non-negative weight $$w_i$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>w</mml:mi> <mml:mi>i</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> such that the weights collectively sum up to 1. The goal is to find an assignment $$\sigma :\mathcal {G}\rightarrow \mathcal {A}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>σ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>:</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>→</mml:mo> <mml:mi>A</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> that maximizes $$\prod _{i\in \mathcal {A}} \left( \sum _{j\in \sigma ^{-1}(i)} v_{ij}\right) ^{w_i}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mo>∏</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>i</mml:mi> <mml:mo>∈</mml:mo> <mml:mi>A</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:msup> <mml:mfenced> <mml:msub> <mml:mo>∑</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>j</mml:mi> <mml:mo>∈</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>σ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>i</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>v</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ij</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mfenced> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>w</mml:mi> <mml:mi>i</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , the product of the weighted valuations of the players. When all the weights equal $$\frac{1}{n}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mfrac> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> </mml:mfrac> </mml:math> , the problem reduces to the classical Nash Social Welfare problem, which has recently received much attention. In this work, we present a $$5\cdot \exp \left( 2\cdot D_{\textrm{KL}}(\textbf{w}\, ||\, \frac{\vec {\textbf{1}}}{n})\right) = 5\cdot \exp \left( 2\log {n} + 2\sum _{i=1}^n w_i \log {w_i}\right) $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> <mml:mo>·</mml:mo> <mml:mo>exp</mml:mo> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mo>·</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>D</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>KL</mml:mtext> </mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>w</mml:mi> <mml:mspace/> <mml:mo>|</mml:mo> <mml:mo>|</mml:mo> <mml:mspace/> </mml:mrow> <mml:mfrac> <mml:mover> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>→</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> </mml:mfrac> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mfenced> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> <mml:mo>·</mml:mo> <mml:mo>exp</mml:mo>

Mathematical Programming
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Yale University (US), Carnegie Mellon University (US)
National Science Foundation, Yale University
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Optimization and Variational Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.