How do platforms matter? Media power, platform power and the digital domination of Australian media

This paper examines how digital platforms have come to embody a new form of media power, reshaping the Australian media economy and challenging traditional understandings of media influence. While legacy media power was grounded in content ownership and political influence, platform power today stems from infrastructural dominance, algorithmic control, and the commodification of user data. Drawing on the concept of the network media economy, the paper explores how tech giants like Alphabet and Meta have overtaken traditional Australian media firms in advertising revenue and market influence. Using metrics such as Concentration Ratio (CR4) and the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index, the paper demonstrates the extreme consolidation within digital services sectors. It also considers the political implications of this shift, highlighting how platform companies are increasingly influential in shaping public discourse and policy, both directly and through their economic leverage. The paper argues for a reframing of media power that encompasses both traditional and emerging forms of dominance, urging policy responses that reflect the integrated, multi-sectoral nature of today's media landscape.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Communication Gazette
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17480485251405986
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How do platforms matter? Media power, platform power and the digital domination of Australian media

Terry Flew, Cameron McTernan
International Communication Gazette
Media Studies and Communication
article

How do platforms matter? Media power, platform power and the digital domination of Australian media

Terry Flew, Cameron McTernan
article en

Abstract

This paper examines how digital platforms have come to embody a new form of media power, reshaping the Australian media economy and challenging traditional understandings of media influence. While legacy media power was grounded in content ownership and political influence, platform power today stems from infrastructural dominance, algorithmic control, and the commodification of user data. Drawing on the concept of the network media economy, the paper explores how tech giants like Alphabet and Meta have overtaken traditional Australian media firms in advertising revenue and market influence. Using metrics such as Concentration Ratio (CR4) and the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index, the paper demonstrates the extreme consolidation within digital services sectors. It also considers the political implications of this shift, highlighting how platform companies are increasingly influential in shaping public discourse and policy, both directly and through their economic leverage. The paper argues for a reframing of media power that encompasses both traditional and emerging forms of dominance, urging policy responses that reflect the integrated, multi-sectoral nature of today's media landscape.

International Communication GazetteVol. 88(1-2)
The University of Sydney (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Media Studies and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.