Trapped in a Vicious Cycle of Political Negativity and Incivility on Social Media? Yes, but Only Before Elections

Numerous studies show that negative and uncivil political content on social media – where politicians criticize and insult each other – boosts voters’ engagement. While research suggests this engagement may fuel further negativity and incivility, this cyclical feedback loop remains theoretically unexplored and empirically untested. In this study, we propose a pre-registered hypothesis based on reinforcement learning theory: politicians may become trapped in a vicious cycle where the voters’ engagement generated by their negative and uncivil posts increases the likelihood of future negativity and incivility, especially in proximity to elections. To test this, we analyzed the daily short-term and monthly long-term effects of voter engagement with negative social media posts by low- and high-profile politicians across full electoral cycles in Belgium and the United States. Our findings reveal a vicious cycle of negativity and incivility based on engagement in the period leading up to elections. This suggests that voters’ inherent negativity bias on social media may contribute to escalating conflict between politicians – but primarily during election campaigns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Politics Research
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x251410935
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trapped in a Vicious Cycle of Political Negativity and Incivility on Social Media? Yes, but Only Before Elections

Željko Poljak, Jelle Muraille
American Politics Research
Social Media and Politics
article

Trapped in a Vicious Cycle of Political Negativity and Incivility on Social Media? Yes, but Only Before Elections

Željko Poljak, Jelle Muraille
article en

Abstract

Numerous studies show that negative and uncivil political content on social media – where politicians criticize and insult each other – boosts voters’ engagement. While research suggests this engagement may fuel further negativity and incivility, this cyclical feedback loop remains theoretically unexplored and empirically untested. In this study, we propose a pre-registered hypothesis based on reinforcement learning theory: politicians may become trapped in a vicious cycle where the voters’ engagement generated by their negative and uncivil posts increases the likelihood of future negativity and incivility, especially in proximity to elections. To test this, we analyzed the daily short-term and monthly long-term effects of voter engagement with negative social media posts by low- and high-profile politicians across full electoral cycles in Belgium and the United States. Our findings reveal a vicious cycle of negativity and incivility based on engagement in the period leading up to elections. This suggests that voters’ inherent negativity bias on social media may contribute to escalating conflict between politicians – but primarily during election campaigns.

American Politics ResearchVol. 54(3)
University of Antwerp (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.