Measuring artificial intelligence: a systematic assessment and implications for governance

Abstract Governing artificial intelligence (AI) inventions is a major policy concern. Yet, definitions and measurement approaches remain contested. We compare four patent-based definitions reflecting distinct understandings of AI. Using US patents (1990–2019), we assess the degree to which each approach describes AI as a general-purpose technology (GPT) and examine patent concentration by a few dominant firms. We find that between 3% and 17% of all US patents in 2019 are classified by at least one of the approaches as AI patents. Yet, only 1.4% of all AI patents are simultaneously identified by all four approaches. All approaches are consistent with AI having GPT characteristics, with the Keyword-based patents exhibiting the highest growth and generality. GPT indicates public good characteristics, which could be used to justify public support. Across methods, AI patents are concentrated among a few firms, highlighting market power and regulatory challenges. The wide variation in the subsets and characteristics of AI patents identified by these approaches suggests that currently multiple classification methods should be considered to formulate robust, inclusive, and effective analyses for AI governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial and Corporate Change
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtaf047
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring artificial intelligence: a systematic assessment and implications for governance

Vilhelm Verendel, Lauren Bennett, Kerstin Hötte, Taheya Tarannum
Industrial and Corporate Change
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
article

Measuring artificial intelligence: a systematic assessment and implications for governance

Vilhelm Verendel, Lauren Bennett, Kerstin Hötte, Taheya Tarannum
article en

Abstract

Abstract Governing artificial intelligence (AI) inventions is a major policy concern. Yet, definitions and measurement approaches remain contested. We compare four patent-based definitions reflecting distinct understandings of AI. Using US patents (1990–2019), we assess the degree to which each approach describes AI as a general-purpose technology (GPT) and examine patent concentration by a few dominant firms. We find that between 3% and 17% of all US patents in 2019 are classified by at least one of the approaches as AI patents. Yet, only 1.4% of all AI patents are simultaneously identified by all four approaches. All approaches are consistent with AI having GPT characteristics, with the Keyword-based patents exhibiting the highest growth and generality. GPT indicates public good characteristics, which could be used to justify public support. Across methods, AI patents are concentrated among a few firms, highlighting market power and regulatory challenges. The wide variation in the subsets and characteristics of AI patents identified by these approaches suggests that currently multiple classification methods should be considered to formulate robust, inclusive, and effective analyses for AI governance.

Industrial and Corporate Change
Leverhulme Trust (GB), Science Oxford (GB), University College London (GB), Kedge Business School (FR), Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.